Los Angeles officials have announced a leadership change at the Department of Water and Power following revelations about the Palisades Fire response, including an empty reservoir and delayed de-energizing of lines. This article lays out what happened with the Santa Ynez Reservoir, the timeline failures at the Palisades substation, the political fallout, and the legal exposure facing the city and utility. It also covers salary and leadership questions that sharpened the controversy and stirred calls for accountability. Quotes from officials and court filings are preserved exactly as reported.
A few weeks after a county judge allowed a major lawsuit tied to the Palisades Fire to proceed, LADWP’s CEO Janisse Quiñones was removed from her post effective March 27, 2026, in what the city calls a “planned leadership transition.” The announcement says Quiñones will return to Puerto Rico to “take a leadership role supporting the modernization and transformation of the Island’s electric grid,” a move many view as a soft landing rather than real accountability. Critics argue the change comes only after public outrage and legal pressure made her position politically untenable.
Mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt publicly demanded Quiñones’ resignation, firing, or prosecution following the fire, and he also targeted Mayor Karen Bass and Governor Gavin Newsom in his criticism. Wednesday’s development removes one target but leaves broader questions about leadership and responsibility at City Hall. For many residents, the personnel change does not erase the consequences of the emergency failures that unfolded during the Palisades disaster.
The Santa Ynez Reservoir, which holds 117 million gallons and feeds three tanks that protect the Palisades, was reportedly empty for nearly a year before the fire. A tear in the reservoir’s floating cover allegedly needed a repair costing under $200,000, but the fix was not completed, leaving the reservoir offline and homeowners below without that critical buffer. The apparent inability to carry out a modest repair before wildfire season is being treated not as a budget mystery but as a failure of operational priorities and leadership.
Beyond the reservoir issue, LADWP failed to de-energize power lines after the fire began, which led to spot fires that spread through the neighborhood and complicated firefighting efforts. LADWP initially claimed power had been shut off, yet multiple videos captured arcing lines and spot fires, even nearly injuring a reporter. Those images contradicted official statements and deepened suspicion that the utility’s emergency procedures broke down at a crucial moment.
Victim attorneys used public records requests to reconstruct the utility’s response timeline, and the complaint contains stark details about delays and tampering. From the Complaint:
After being instructed at 1:40 p.m. on January 7th to go to the Palisades substation to de-energize the electrical circuits, LADWP’s patrolman did not arrive at the substation until 6:18 p.m., or approximately five and a half hours later. When the patrolman tried to de-energize the circuits, the outdated equipment failed, and he had to evacuate the substation without de-energizing any of the circuits because the fire was outside the substation. Twenty-two days later on January 29th, the patrolman went back into LADWP’s computer log and attempted to alter the time that he arrived at the Palisades substation from 6:18 p.m. to 1:47 p.m., in an attempt to eliminate the 5-1/2 hour delay.
LADWP spokespeople argued that “The system was never designed for a wildfire scenario that we are experiencing,” yet the very reason Santa Ynez exists is to protect against wildfire threats after the historic Bel Air Fire. That defense rings hollow to many who point out the reservoir was built exactly to provide fire resilience. The contrast between the stated purpose of infrastructure and the utility’s actions during the emergency fuels calls for consequences.
Quiñones arrived at LADWP in May 2024 from PG&E and was hired at a salary of $750,000, a sharp jump from the $435,000 paid to the prior leader. City council members defended the pay as necessary to attract top talent from investor-owned utilities, yet critics question whether the taxpayer-funded bump produced commensurate results. Many residents now see the high salary and the operational failures as a bad trade for the city and grounds for a tougher political reaction.
The leadership dispute also has legal implications, with the city and LADWP facing potential multi-million-dollar judgments as the lawsuit proceeds. Mayor Bass offered praise for Quiñones’ tenure in the official statement, saying, “Janisse brought steady leadership and engineering expertise to LADWP during a critical period for our city. Her focus on resilience, reliability, and strengthening the workforce has helped position the Department for continued progress. We thank her for her service to Los Angeles.” That public gratitude contrasts sharply with the anger and grief voiced by fire victims.
For conservatives and taxpayers demanding accountability, the episode highlights a pattern of weak oversight and misplaced priorities at key city agencies. The focus now turns to the lawsuit, possible policy and operational reforms at LADWP, and whether city leaders will make substantive changes rather than optics. Residents want stronger protections and clear answers about why inexpensive fixes went undone when stakes were life and property.
Add comment