President Donald Trump has reportedly sent a 15-point peace plan to Iran aimed at halting hostilities, dealing with Tehran’s nuclear and missile programs, and securing a monthlong ceasefire while negotiations move forward. The plan is said to have been transmitted through Pakistani intermediaries, with senior U.S. advisers coordinating a framework modeled in part on previous diplomatic deals. Officials speaking to media outlets described broad outlines rather than releasing the full text, and high-level interlocutors from Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey are mentioned as facilitating talks. Observers say this effort seeks a quick diplomatic off-ramp to stop further destruction while pressuring Iran to abandon nuclear ambitions.
Reports indicate the proposal addresses both ballistic missiles and nuclear activities in specific terms, though the full document has not been publicly shared. Two U.S. officials reportedly confirmed that the plan borrows elements from prior agreements and would allow a formal negotiating period under a temporary ceasefire. The ceasefire, as described in some briefings, could last roughly one month to give both sides breathing room to hammer out more detailed commitments. This approach reflects a blend of pressure and pragmatic talks that supporters claim is the most effective way to produce durable results.
The New York Times did not see a copy of the plan, but the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive details, shared some of its broad outlines, saying that it addresses Iran’s ballistic missile and nuclear programs.
Israel and the United States have targeted Iran’s ballistic missiles, launchers and production facilities, and its nuclear program in the bombing campaign that began on Feb. 28. American and Israeli leaders have vowed never to allow Iran to possess a nuclear weapon.
President Trump told reporters at the White House that Iran had agreed to abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons, and he described a significant, oil-and-gas related gift tied to the Strait of Hormuz without offering full details. He called it a “very big present worth a tremendous amount of money,” and said the gesture gave him confidence he was dealing with the right people. Those remarks were delivered in a tight-lipped manner, leaving analysts to weigh whether the signal was political messaging, an economic concession, or a concrete step toward de-escalation. Either way, the administration frames the development as leverage that strengthens negotiations.
It’s a “very big present worth a tremendous amount of money,” Trump said in the Oval Office today. He said it was “oil and gas related.”
Trump, pressed, declined to say what it was, but allowed that it had something to do with the Strait of Hormuz and it’s a gift so big, so serious, that it gives the president confidence that he is negotiating with “the right people” in Iran.
According to multiple briefings, two of the president’s close advisers have been deeply involved in building the ceasefire framework. Middle East envoys have reportedly worked on arranging a declaration that would freeze major hostilities while diplomats negotiate core security issues. The stated goal is to create a predictable window during which both sides can make concessions without the immediate threat of more strikes and destruction. Republican supporters frame this as a strategic pause that preserves U.S. and allied leverage while pursuing concrete, verifiable limits on Iran’s military programs.
Donald Trump is seeking a one-month ceasefire with Iran and has submitted a 15-point peace plan as Washington hunts for a swift offramp from the war.
Middle East envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff are working on a framework involving ‘the declaration of a monthlong ceasefire period, during which the sides would negotiate,’ sources told Israel’s Channel 12.
The 15-point plan, modeled on Trump’s Gaza deal, was confirmed by two officials briefed on the talks, the New York Times reported.
Pakistani military leadership is reported to be the conduit for messages between Washington and Tehran, a role that underscores regional geopolitics and pragmatic channels of communication. Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir is said to have ties enabling him to pass sensitive messages to Iranian figures who can influence decisions. Egypt and Turkey are also named as regional actors encouraging Tehran to engage in constructive discussions rather than prolonged warfare. These multilayered contacts reflect a U.S. approach that uses allied relationships to open diplomatic doors.
Pakistan’s army chief, Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, has emerged as the key interlocutor between the United States and Iran, with Egypt and Turkey encouraging the Iranians to engage constructively, the officials added. Field Marshal Munir is believed to maintain close ties to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, putting him in a position to pass messages between the warring sides, they said.
Israeli leaders have hinted that a diplomatic track might be underway, though political and military dynamics on the ground complicate quick resolution. Iran’s internal communication problems amid ongoing strikes make unified responses difficult, which in turn affects whether Tehran will accept an externally proposed plan. The core question remains whether Iran will trade a ceasefire and negotiated terms for continued survival of vital capabilities, or double down and risk further military losses. Republican policymakers argue the president’s mix of force and negotiation offers the best path to curb threats while avoiding open-ended conflict.
Add comment