Karoline Leavitt Warns Comey He May Want to Pause His ‘Victory Lap’ Because ‘Everyone Knows He Lied’

The Justice Department’s dismissal of the case against James Comey sparked a swift reaction from White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who signaled the administration will fight the ruling and reminded the public of Comey’s past conduct while urging caution about any public celebration.

After a judge tossed the prosecution because the prosecutor was deemed unlawfully appointed, Leavitt told reporters the administration plans to appeal and that the ruling was a technical decision the White House disagrees with. She framed the outcome as temporary and promised the DOJ would move quickly to seek a reversal. From the administration’s perspective, the legal battle is far from finished and political theater should be muted until appeals play out.

Leavitt delivered a pointed critique of Comey’s credibility during an on-camera exchange, saying his public celebrations might be premature given the broader legal context. She invoked long-standing accusations about his testimony to suggest the public should take his triumphal statements with skepticism. The press secretary made it clear the White House sees the ruling as shielding prominent figures from accountability rather than settling the matter.

Well, what I will say is that everybody knows that James Comey lied to Congress.

It’s as clear as day, and this judge took an unprecedented action to throw these cases out to shield James Comey and Letitia James from accountability, based on a technical ruling. And the administration disagrees with that technical ruling. We believe the attorney in this case, Lindsey Halligan, is not only extremely qualified for this position, but she was, in fact, legally appointed.

And I know the Department of Justice will be appealing this in very short order. So maybe James Comey should pump the brakes on his victory lap.

Watch:

The White House also stressed continued confidence in the prosecutor at the center of the controversy, saying the appointment of the acting U.S. attorney was lawful and appropriate. From the administration’s view, dismissals based on procedural issues should not obscure the substantive questions at the heart of the case. Officials insist they will pursue every avenue to restore the charges or retry their legal theory through the appeals process.

Comey responded with a video in which he described the prosecution as tainted by “malevolence and incompetence,” presenting himself as the victim of politicized legal action. That reaction was met with skepticism by critics who pointed to earlier controversies surrounding his public statements and conduct. Leavitt and others seized on those past episodes as reason to doubt the moral high ground Comey claimed in his remarks.

The judge’s dismissal was issued without prejudice, a point that lawyers and officials quickly noted to explain why the case could return to court. Legal experts say that when a case is dismissed without prejudice, prosecutors often have the ability to refile charges if procedural problems are corrected. The administration emphasized that legal routes remain open, including the potential for recharging should an appeals court allow it.

The appointment at issue came after an acting U.S. attorney was selected to lead the Eastern District of Virginia following a resignation. That appointment, and the way it was carried out, became the central legal issue in the judge’s ruling. The White House has argued the move was routine and lawful, and it framed the judge’s decision as an unusual interpretation that can and should be overturned on appeal.

Critics of the ruling argued it reflects a pattern of judges intruding on prosecutorial discretion and, in their view, undermining accountability for public figures. Supporters of the judge’s decision countered that adherence to statutory appointments and constitutional requirements is essential to the rule of law. The dispute now moves from headlines to appellate briefs as both sides prepare for the next phase of litigation.

The political stakes are high: a successful appeal could revive the charges and subject Comey and others to renewed legal jeopardy, while an affirmation of the dismissal would close this chapter in a way critics of the former FBI director would regard as a setback. For now, the White House message is emphatic — the administration will not accept the judge’s interpretation without a fight and believes the facts and appointments will withstand appellate scrutiny.

Until higher courts weigh in, public statements from both the White House and Comey will continue to shape the narrative surrounding the case. The legal process will determine whether this episode is a temporary detour or a decisive exoneration. Either way, officials on the administration side are warning that the story is not over and that public declarations of victory should be held until the appeals court issues its ruling.