Federal employees from at least two government departments have been instructed to eliminate pronouns from their email signature blocks by Friday at 5 p.m. This directive underscores the Trump administration’s firm stance against Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies within government operations. The decision marks a significant shift in federal policy regarding gender identity in official communications.
Memos acquired by ABC News reveal that both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) have communicated these orders to their staff. Employees are required to remove pronouns from their email signatures as part of a revised policy. “Pronouns and any other information not permitted in the policy must be removed from CDC/ATSDR employee signatures by 5 p.m. ET on Friday,” stated a memo from CDC Chief Information Officer Jason Bonander.
The directive is backed by an executive order signed by President Trump titled “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.” This order emphasizes scientific recognition of only two sexes, male and female. “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female,” the order declares, reinforcing a traditional understanding of gender.
During his inaugural speech, President Trump committed to aligning government policy with scientific facts. He pledged to “end the government policy of trying to socially engineer race and gender into every aspect of public and private life.” This move is seen as a step towards creating a merit-based, colorblind society as envisioned by the president.
“As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders, male and female,” Trump announced. This declaration marks a clear departure from the policies endorsed by the previous administration. The Trump administration’s approach aims to consolidate a unified and scientifically grounded understanding of gender.
The Biden administration, in contrast, had supported the inclusion of gender pronouns in official communications. Towards the end of President Biden’s first year in office, the Air Force permitted the use of gender pronouns in signature blocks. This move was part of a broader effort to reflect diversity and inclusion in government communications.
Chief Information Officer Lauren Barrett Knausenberger had outlined this policy in a memo, stating, “This guidance provides approval for the use of pronouns in electronic signature blocks.” The memo included templates for incorporating pronouns in official documents, reflecting a more inclusive approach. “The use of pronouns (he/him, she/her, or they/them) in an email signature block is authorized but not required,” the document stated.
This decision by the Air Force was seen by some as an attempt to outpace other military branches in terms of inclusivity. The move sparked debate about the role of gender identity in military and government communications. Critics argued that such policies could undermine military effectiveness.
As of now, it remains uncertain whether other government departments will adopt similar measures to remove pronouns from email signatures. However, it seems likely that similar instructions might be forthcoming. The Trump administration’s policy reflects a broader effort to restore what it terms “biological truth” to government practices.
For those who agree with President Trump’s policy, RedState offers a VIP account to stay updated on related news. VIP status provides access to exclusive stories and podcasts. Additionally, a Gold-level account gives access to all sister sites in Townhall Media, while the Platinum level offers even more benefits, including feature-length films.
The move to restore traditional gender recognition in federal communications aligns with the political ideologies of figures like Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater. This approach is rooted in a belief in fundamental truths and a rejection of progressive ideologies. For many conservatives, this policy represents a return to core values.
The Trump administration’s actions emphasize a commitment to clear and unambiguous government policies. While the debate over gender identity continues, this decision marks a definitive stance by the current administration. The directive to remove pronouns underscores a broader political and social philosophy.
The implications of this policy change are yet to be fully realized, but it is clear it aligns with a conservative worldview. By prioritizing what it considers scientific accuracy, the administration aims to reinforce traditional values. Critics of this policy may view it as a step backward, but supporters see it as a necessary correction.
In a political landscape often dominated by ideological battles, the Trump administration’s approach is a clarion call for clarity and consistency. By focusing on biological truths, the administration seeks to ground its policies in what it sees as undeniable facts. This move is likely to resonate with those who feel that previous policies have strayed too far from reality.
The directive to remove pronouns from federal email signatures is a symbolic, yet significant, action. It highlights a broader commitment to restoring what the administration views as foundational truths. Whether this policy will be adopted across all government departments remains to be seen.
While some may argue that the policy is divisive, it undeniably reflects the administration’s commitment to its stated principles. The focus on biological reality is seen as a counter to what some consider the excesses of progressive ideology. The debate over gender identity in government policy is far from over.
The Communist Democrats have almost destroyed the English Language by changing everything spoken.
Illegals are called; Neighboring Migrants.
Women who are pregnant are called; Person whose carrying.
A transgender man; Can get pregnant.
Genders are; Three Genders.
PMS is; A person who discharges.
There’s many more and the Communist have changed definitions on multiple words.
My take on pronouns to identify yourself is,, Go Fuc* Yourself.!
bravo …lol
awesome ..just awesome .
Pronouns are only needed in 3rd person – not when you are communicating directly with someone. I do not have any need to know what someone refers to themselves as in their Personal Life. It was always completely irrelevant and it does not belong in any professional communications.. If I am communicating with someone in business and not talking about them, but TO them, I only need to know their name. This whole thing was complete Bull Chit !!