I explain recent findings that noncitizens appeared on New Jersey voter rolls, summarize what the records show about registrations and alleged votes, highlight the partisan pattern noted in the documents, and press the case for stronger voter identification and audit practices in light of these revelations.
New Jersey’s voter rolls have been under fresh scrutiny after records produced to Republican requesters showed multiple instances of noncitizens listed as registered voters. Officials and local records reveal several people seeking naturalization who said they were unknowingly registered and, in some cases, had their names removed only after they raised concerns. This story matters because voter rolls are the foundation of free and fair elections, and any flaw in them undermines public confidence.
Noncitizens in a key blue state were on the voter rolls for years — and some even voted in prior elections, according to documents obtained via public records request.
The New Jersey Republican Party (NJGOP) and the Republican National Committee (RNC) requested voter rolls from all 21 counties in the Garden State and found multiple instances of noncitizens seeking naturalization asking to be removed from the rolls, claiming they were unknowingly registered to vote. Most were registered as Democrats.
Noncitizens cannot vote in state or federal elections, and the candidates for citizenship worried that being on the rolls would disqualify them.
The pattern in the records is unsettling: many of the self-reports claim the registrants did not know they were on the rolls and many of those names were marked as Democrats. That partisan concentration raises questions about how registrations are collected and verified, especially when agencies that issue driving credentials are involved in voter registration processes. When registration errors systematically tilt to one party, citizens rightly ask whether it is sloppy administration or something more deliberate.
One noncitizen, who the county said was removed from the rolls in 2015, voted several times in 2000 and 2001, and in the 2008 general election. Another voted in a primary election in 2005 and a municipal election in 2000.
Those specific voting instances, if confirmed, are serious because noncitizens are explicitly barred from casting ballots in federal and state contests. The presence of names that later required removal suggests the need for better checks at registration points and routine maintenance of the rolls. Republican officials who obtained the records argue these examples are likely the tip of the iceberg and that more transparency from state and local offices would show the full scale.
Many of the affected individuals obtained lawful driving privileges, which in turn exposed them to voter registration processes that can be automated or handled by third parties. If people are ending up on voter lists without clear consent, we need clearer safeguards built into every step where eligibility is presumed. Voter registration should be deliberate, verified, and auditable, not an incidental outcome of getting a license or filling out paperwork.
RNC Chairman Joe Gruters says the group found hundreds of noncitizen registrants in New Jersey who are likely only the tip of the iceberg, but that New Jersey and other Democrat-run states are unwilling to disclose information about their voter registration list maintenance processes. The organization has requested that information from 48 states.
“I mean, it’s really incredible because here the Democrats are saying that, you know, noncitizens never vote, [that], this is a non-issue, but every county we’re finding people that are self-reporting now, and I’m glad we’re doing these records request because it’s really eye-opening, because this is just the people that have self-reported,” Gruters told Fox News Digital.
Transparency is a basic demand here: audits, public records, and cooperation from county clerks should be routine, not resisted. The RNC and state Republican officials say they requested broader information and have been blocked or stonewalled in several places. Where records are produced, they want detailed comparisons showing the share of affected names and the processes that led to their inclusion on the rolls.
Democrats who dismiss isolated incidents as trivial or impossible leave voters uneasy, because a small number of illegal votes can swing close contests and because repeated administration failures create fertile ground for abuse. Republicans favor common-sense reforms like mandatory ID checks, cross-agency verification, and timely list maintenance to ensure the rolls reflect eligible voters only. Those measures are about restoring trust and preventing future problems.
With midterm elections approaching, confidence in the mechanics of voting matters as much as the campaigns themselves. Voters deserve clear answers about how many noncitizens were registered, whether any ineligible ballots were cast, and what practical steps will be taken to prevent recurrence. The state and county officials in charge of elections should make the records available and explain the fixes they will implement.
These issues are not theoretical. When registration systems conflate different public services or rely on unchecked data transfers, mistakes happen and bad actors can exploit gaps. Republicans argue the simplest path to stronger elections is enforcing the rules already on the books and improving verification at points of registration. That approach protects the right to vote for citizens while keeping the process resilient against error or fraud.
Add comment