Hillary Clinton sat for a videotaped deposition with the House Oversight Committee about Jeffrey Epstein, insisting she has no useful information while framing the inquiry as political. Committee members went to Chappaqua, New York, to question her, and Bill Clinton is scheduled to answer questions the next day. Oversight Chairman James Comer warned the sessions would run long as lawmakers press for clarity about the Clintons’ ties to Epstein. The exchanges include sharply worded statements from both sides and raise fresh public interest in who knew what and when.
The deposition did not take place on Capitol Hill; instead, committee members traveled to the Chappaqua Performing Arts Center to question Mrs. Clinton at her home. That setting didn’t soften the tone. Republicans say the trip was necessary to get answers after months of stalled cooperation, and they view the location as a reasonable accommodation to secure sworn testimony.
Chairman Comer made clear his intent before questioning began, telling reporters to expect lengthy sessions and probing testimony from both Clintons. “Today will be a long deposition, and tomorrow will be an even longer deposition,” he said, signaling that Republicans plan to press hard on ties to Epstein. The goal, as Comer put it, is to “try to understand, many things about Epstein,” not to short-circuit due process.
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) also told reporters to expect “long” depositions with the Clintons over the next two days about their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
“Today will be a long deposition, and tomorrow will be an even longer deposition,” Comer said before interviewing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Chappaqua, NY, on Thursday.
Former President Bill Clinton will sit for a deposition at the same location on Friday, and many members of the Oversight panel will be grilling the first couple.
Mrs. Clinton opened with a lengthy, combative four-page statement that denied any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes and criticized the committee’s inquiry. She reiterated that she never encountered Epstein, never flew on his plane, and never visited his properties, presenting a clear, concise defense. The tone of the statement read as both legal positioning and political pushback, asserting innocence while charging the committee with partisan motives.
The Committee justified its subpoena to me based on its assumption that I have information regarding the investigations into the criminal activities of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Let me be as clear as I can. I do not.
As I stated in my sworn declaration on January 13, I had no idea about their criminal activities. I do not recall ever encountering Mr. Epstein. I never flew on his plane or visited his island, homes or offices. I have nothing to add to that.
Republicans pushing the probe point out how the Clintons resisted earlier efforts to testify, only agreeing after Comer advanced contempt proceedings and leverage grew in Congress. That resistance reinforces a familiar narrative for GOP critics: powerful figures often sidestep scrutiny until pressure forces cooperation. The deposition marks a turning point in the investigation where sworn testimony replaces declarative statements and press releases.
The substance of the questioning will focus on long-standing questions about Bill Clinton’s flights on Epstein’s plane and any social or transactional ties to Epstein’s inner circle. Many want to know whether the Clintons’ public charitable work intersected in troubling ways with Epstein’s private conduct. Those are not idle curiosities; they go to whether elected leaders turned a blind eye to a known predator or were simply careless about associations.
Mrs. Clinton’s statement also pivoted to her global anti-trafficking work and accused the committee and the administration of political motives. That framing is predictable, but lawmakers say the probe is about basic facts: flight logs, known contacts, and who had firsthand knowledge of Epstein’s networks. Republicans insist the work is not personal retribution but a public responsibility to investigate possible complicity or negligence.
Outside observers and partisans on both sides will watch the videotaped deposition closely, parsing answers and counting inconsistencies. For those who believe powerful people are often treated differently under the law, this is a rare opportunity to get sworn answers. For Democrats and Clinton allies, it will look like a politically driven spectacle; for Republicans, it is an overdue fact-finding mission.
Bill Clinton’s deposition is set for the following day at the same Chappaqua venue, and many expect even tougher questioning about his relationship with Epstein. Republicans expect the sessions to produce testimony that can be evaluated under oath and compared to existing records. Whatever comes out, these depositions will shape public perception and give Congress a clearer record to use in its oversight work.
So, Hilldabeast lied to Congress AGAIN and nothing was said about her perjury. As Always, the beast will be given a free pass because they are important. Huh? Tuesday night Trump asked Congress to stand up if they believed it was their mission to protect Americans, not illegal Aliens. When are we Americans going to be protected from Hilldabeast??????