This article examines a report that Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, has resigned, citing the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ near-total control of state decisions, and considers what that could mean for Iran’s internal balance of power and regional stability.
A recent claim says President Masoud Pezeshkian submitted his resignation to Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, alleging that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has sidelined civilian authorities. The account rests on anonymous sources and a London-based outlet, so it reads as a leak rather than confirmed fact, but the allegation itself is stark and worth unpacking.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian sent a letter to Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei‘s office submitting his resignation, London-based anti-regime outlet Iran International reported on Sunday.
An anonymous official told Iran International that the letter had called out the fact that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had effectively taken over large portions of the government, and that the president and other high-ranking officials had been cut out of vital decision-making.
Pezeshkian, the letter emphasized, was unable to run the government or fulfill his responsibilities under the circumstances, and as such, requested to resign.
That quoted material is the heart of the report and it paints a picture of a civilian president saying he cannot do his job because the IRGC is making the key calls. If accurate, that represents more than ordinary factional fighting; it suggests a structural shift in how Iran is governed, with the IRGC acting as the effective state. We should be cautious given the anonymous sourcing, but the allegation aligns with long-standing concerns about the IRGC’s power.
Another set of anonymous claims in the report traces the rift to disagreements over wartime strategy and the economic fallout citizens are facing. The story says senior IRGC leaders and the president differ on “the way the war was managed and its destructive consequences on the people’s livelihoods and the country’s economy.” That line captures both the military and domestic stakes at play inside Tehran’s corridors of power.
Anonymous sources told Iran International that the primary source of the differences between Pezeshkian and the head of the IRGC, who is believed to currently hold the lion’s share of power in the regime, was “the way the war was managed and its destructive consequences on the people’s livelihoods and the country’s economy.”
Last week, US officials revealed to CBS that Khamenei is hidden in a secret location with little access to the outside world, only reachable through a “labyrinth” of couriers.
Even the highest officials in the Iranian government are unaware of his location and are not able to directly contact him, the officials said.
Beyond the resignation claim, the report includes assertions that Mojtaba Khamenei is isolated and hard to reach, with communication routed through a “labyrinth” of couriers. If the supreme leader is effectively sequestered, that complicates any centralized civilian pushback and makes the IRGC’s control harder to contest. Fragmented command and secrecy at the top can accelerate a slide toward military-dominated governance.
Consider what a full IRGC takeover of daily functions would mean. The IRGC is a regime-loyal institution with incentives to hold power even at great cost to ordinary Iranians. If senior commanders flee with assets abroad, the remaining ranks could grow more radical and less restrained, increasing the risk of desperate, violent behavior that harms both Iran and its neighbors.
That prospect is worrying for regional stability and for American interests. A militarized Iran run by IRGC operatives would be less predictable and likelier to back proxies, disrupt shipping, or pursue nuclear ambitions without the brakes a civilian government might apply. The good news in this scenario, if any, is that the IRGC’s operational capacity and popular legitimacy are not limitless; sustained pressure and coordination with allies can blunt their reach.
For now, there has been no official response from U.S. authorities to this report, and the claims remain unverified. Still, the allegation that a sitting president felt compelled to resign because he had been shut out of decision-making deserves attention from policymakers and analysts tracking Iran’s internal power dynamics.
Add comment