Naomi Seibt, a 25-year-old German conservative and outspoken climate skeptic often labeled the “anti-Greta,” says she has faced harassment, death threats, and surveillance in Germany and has applied for asylum in the United States while she waits for a hearing.
Naomi Seibt is a German citizen and conservative activist who has made a name opposing mainstream climate alarmism. She says the backlash has been intense, with threats that escalated to the point where she felt compelled to seek refuge abroad.
Her case centers on claims that German authorities have monitored her public statements “for years” and that she has endured sustained threats from left-wing groups. She says police told her they could not act until she suffered direct physical harm, a response she calls inadequate and dangerous.
This is one asylum-seeker who should be .
Her post continues:
As a free speech advocate and supporter of the AfD party, I am the target of
- intelligence surveillance
- state media defamation
- ANTIFA threats
Thanks to @elonmusk, I received a voice on 𝕏 and was able to help make the AfD party internationally popular.
The German government is supporting left-wing vioIence, covering up MIGRANT CRlMES and silencing dissidents with mass house raids.
The tax-funded propaganda media monopolize the narrative and defame the Trump administration – even Charlie Kirk – constantly.
As a representative for Germany’s leading alternative media outlet @Deu_Kurier, I vow to expose the TRUTH.
Only the AfD can save Germany.
Thank you for your attention.
She has been labeled the “anti-Greta” for pushing back against high-profile climate activism, and she says the hostility toward her views has crossed into threats and alleged surveillance.
Seibt is in the United States now and awaiting an asylum hearing, which will determine whether she can remain while claiming persecution. Part of her case is that German police told her they could not help until she was physically attacked, a stance she described as unacceptable and frightening.
“In 2024, I found out that I had been spied on by German intelligence for years. Simultaneously, I keep receiving death threats from Antifa,” she said.
“I went to the German police, and they told me that they can’t do anything about it as long as I have not actually been raped or killed.”
“I am not getting protection from the German government even though I am at major risk of potentially being killed,” she added.
The wider argument from her supporters is that free speech in parts of Europe is under pressure and that individuals who dissent from prevailing narratives sometimes face severe consequences. They point to broader cultural and political shifts as reasons people would consider relocating to countries where speech and political plurality feel more protected.
Advocates for Seibt argue she would contribute to American public life if granted asylum, noting her media experience and vocal activism. They portray her as resilient, capable of supporting herself, and likely to engage quickly in political and media circles here.
The case also intersects with debates about immigration law and asylum standards, and what level of threat justifies protection when domestic authorities are perceived as failing to act. Legal experts will weigh claims of targeted threats, surveillance, and the credibility of the alleged risks during the hearing.
Her story highlights how dissidents, whether critics of climate policy or supporters of controversial parties, can become flashpoints in broader transatlantic discussions about free speech, public safety, and government accountability. The outcome of her asylum request will be watched by those who see her situation as emblematic of larger cultural and political battles.
Add comment