Universities keep talking diversity while their commencement stages tell a different story: partisan, predictable, and overwhelmingly Democratic. The trend shows a persistent 6-to-1 imbalance at top schools, with 86 percent of partisan commencement speakers this year identified as Democrats. That pattern stretches back years and signals how campus leadership values align with speaker choices. Conservatives see graduations as one last platform where campus powerbrokers reinforce their worldview.
Every spring the same pattern repeats: colleges invite prominent liberals and Democrats to address graduates, and conservative speakers are scarce. This year’s analysis of top institutions finds Democrats or Democrat-leaning speakers outnumber Republicans by roughly 6-to-1 at the nation’s Top 100 universities. The roster of liberal voices includes governors, senators, media figures, and Hollywood names, while the conservative list is short and familiar.
Among those scheduled this spring are Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI), Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Gov. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA), MSNBC president Rebecca Kutler, Jonathan Capehart, Sarah Jessica Parker, and Jane Lynch. The conservative or right-leaning speakers identified were Mike Huckabee, Arthur Brooks, Colt McCoy, and Eric Dickerson. Those numbers make the imbalance unmistakable and show it is not a one-off seasonal complaint.
This is not a new development. The same 6-to-1 ratio showed up in past years, including a 2015 survey that found no conservative speakers at the Top 10 schools and a similar spread across the elite institutions. In 2025 the split was about 5-to-1, and 2023 and 2024 resembled that pattern. After more than a decade of this, the message from university leadership is consistent: they prefer speakers who echo their politics.
Critics say commencements have shifted from celebration to platform. Jonathan Turley put it plainly in his critique: “Faculty members and administrators want to use commencements as a final opportunity for indoctrination, including inviting a liberal candidate for the Senate to give a campaign speech,” Turley wrote. “It treats its students and their families as a captive audience.” That quote captures why many conservative families feel excluded from the ceremony’s tone.
Examples of political speeches from commencement stages are already numerous this season. Nancy Pelosi used a Notre Dame de Namur address to hammer the GOP and former President Trump, and Rep. Jamie Raskin used two ceremonies to press for packing the Supreme Court. James Talarico turned a Paul Quinn College speech into what looked like a campaign rally, recycling the same talking points he uses on the trail.
University selection panels—faculty and administrators—regularly choose speakers who reflect their institutional values, and that often means liberal viewpoints. As Zach Greenberg of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression noted, commencement speaker choices “reflect the values of the institution.” At many top universities, those institutional values tilt firmly left, and the result is predictable speaker lineups.
Some cases show how fragile conservative access can be. Georgetown replaced a Jewish undergraduate commencement speaker after protests and brought in a law professor who has criticized the Republican-led inquiry into campus antisemitism. That swap underlines who holds decision-making power and how controversies can quickly reshape a ceremony’s lineup to favor certain perspectives.
For conservative students and families, the experience is disheartening: a celebration of achievement that doubles as a final reminder of who runs elite campuses. After years of similar ratios and repeated complaints, the pattern feels deliberate rather than accidental. Those watching from the right see a clear signal that campus leaders will keep picking speakers who mirror their politics.
Editor’s Note: President Trump is fighting to ensure America’s kids get the education they deserve.
Add comment