Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

X influencer Black Insurrectionist has revealed that a whistleblower affidavit is set to expose alleged special treatment given to Kamala Harris during a recent debate with Donald Trump.

According to the whistleblower’s claims, Harris’s team was provided with questions ahead of time and had prior knowledge that moderators would fact-check Trump during the debate.

The affidavit also alleges that ABC, the network responsible for hosting the debate, made separate accommodations for Harris, which were not communicated to the Trump campaign.

Black Insurrectionist, known for sharing politically charged content, has stated that the affidavit will be publicly released by Sunday.

In a series of tweets, the influencer elaborated on the contents of the affidavit and the potential fallout from its release. He indicated that his attorney had already contacted ABC, warning them about the upcoming release.

The tweets also highlighted that ABC has not outright denied certain key allegations, such as providing Harris’s campaign with “sample” questions or negotiating specific production-related accommodations that may have given Harris an advantage.

In one tweet, Black Insurrectionist wrote:

“For the record, I have had my attorney put a call into ABC advising them that myself and possibly others will be releasing the whistleblower affidavit over the weekend. The ABC denials that have been put out thus far have not denied giving the Harris campaign ‘sample’ questions, nor has ABC denied negotiating assurances with the Harris campaign in regards to the fact-checking of Donald Trump and the special accommodations on the podium and various other aspects of production that were meant to mislead the viewer.”

This series of claims comes at a highly contentious moment in the 2024 election campaign, with both Trump and Harris under intense scrutiny.

The allegations suggest that the debate process may have been manipulated in Harris’s favor, with ABC allegedly playing a role in shaping the public perception of the event.

While ABC has responded to the allegations with denials, Black Insurrectionist emphasizes that certain critical points have yet to be addressed by the network.

Specifically, he points out that ABC has not refuted the claims about providing questions in advance or offering Harris’s campaign special assurances regarding fact-checking during the debate.

The whistleblower affidavit, if accurate, could have significant implications for the Harris campaign and the perceived fairness of the debate.

The revelation that one candidate may have been given preferential treatment during a national debate would likely fuel further distrust in the media and the political process.

It could also spark accusations of bias and calls for increased transparency in how debates are organized and moderated.

As the political landscape continues to intensify ahead of the 2024 election, the upcoming release of the affidavit is expected to draw significant attention from both supporters and critics of Harris and Trump.

The veracity of these claims, once the affidavit is made public, could play a crucial role in shaping the narrative around the debate and the broader election campaign.

5 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • I hope there is going to be something about her ear-rings & possibly a hearing device implanted in the left (or both) ear-rings or just her ear(s).
    She made notes throughout the night. is she writing about a certain answer she needs to her people listening in the background or was that a signal to get answers for subject at hand.
    Put this info out there to someone who can check on these statements I’ve made

  • She seemed so unlike herself, smooth and controlled. No word salad statements as she is wont to do. I noticed when asked a question by the moderators, she’d first looked down to her right to the podium desktop before answering the question. Was she looking at notes?
    Then there’s the “pearl earrings” situation. Are they as some claim, receiver earrings?