Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

A co-host of ABC’s “The View” expressed surprise at a comment made by guest and MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, who is known for her liberal views, about certain conservative justices on the U.S. Supreme Court.

“The blatant corruption of a couple of these Supreme Court justices is John Roberts’ problem. He is the chief justice, he has to police it to save his court and to save the legal system,” the MSNBC host said, which appeared to surprise co-host Sunny Hostin, who is an attorney by trade.

The left-leaning media and Democratic Party have intensified their criticisms of Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

Thomas has been scrutinized for allegedly failing to fully disclose gifts such as private flights and other privileges from a wealthy Republican donor, while Alito has faced backlash for reportedly flying the U.S. flag upside-down at his residence for a period of time.

Hostin appeared to challenge Maddow’s assertions, but Maddow maintained her position.

“I work at MSNBC. If there was a member of my family lobbying the White House chief of staff, saying, ‘overturn this election result,’ you think they’d let me cover that election result, let alone give a binding judicial ruling on that election result?” she said, a reference to Thomas’ wife, Ginni Thomas, texted then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows urging him to challenge then-President Trump’s 2020 election loss.

Maddow also argued the Supreme Court had effectively already given Trump immunity, despite not yet issuing a ruling on his immunity claim, “because they’ve already delayed things so long that the stuff that he did in 2020, he’s not going to be tried for before he potentially gets back in the White House.”

On the record, as per previous regulations and norms, Thomas was not obligated to provide such disclosures.

He admitted that future changes to these regulations would necessitate them, and he promised to adhere to the updated rule.

Regarding Alito, he asserted that his wife was responsible for turning the flag upside down, and there is no evidence to indicate otherwise.

Also, The View’s co-hosts are fickle in their criticisms; most of them were singing the high court’s praises when justices preserved access to the abortion medication mifepristone.

“It does restore a little bit of my faith in the court,” Hostin said on Thursday. “Because the legal standard is, do you have standing to bring a case? Can anybody bring a case in front of the Supreme Court? No. You have to prove that you have injuries resulting from it, and so you’ve got a group of doctors and a group of citizens, and all of these people bring this challenge to the FDA and say, we don’t want this pill.”

Co-host Sara Haines said the ruling reminded her to remain faithful in the country’s institutions.

“We focus so much on the hot topics, on the results, rather than the legal reasoning and always call the judges conservative or liberal. It’s about the interpretation of the law, so reminding ourselves to have faith in this judicial [system], especially the Supreme Court, because it’s easy to attack them like regular politicians, but we need to remain faithful in our institutions. That’s why so many of us are scared,” she said.

In his court writing, Justice Brett Kavanaugh recognized the challengers’ genuine legal, moral, ideological, and policy opposition to elective abortion by others and the FDA’s modifications to the conditions for using the drug in 2016 and 2021.

However, he pointed out that the challengers failed to prove that they would suffer any harm from the FDA’s mifepristone policies.

Under the Constitution, simply objecting to abortion and the FDA’s policies is not sufficient to bring a case in federal court.

He suggested that the appropriate place to voice those objections is in the political or regulatory arena.

ICYMI: House GOP Seeks Nullification of Charges Against Bannon and Navarro in New Resolution

6 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Start by evaluating your skills, hobbies, and interests. Determine what you’re passionate about or what skills you possess that can be monetized.

    H­­E­­R­­Eཽ҉҉҉҉ →꙲꙲→→ W­w­w.w­e­b­i­n­c­o­m­e­5­4­.­b­l­o­g­s­p­o­t.C­o­m

  • “Free Speech advocate, Rachel Maddow is making waves for an outburst aimed at her own network for airing former President Donald Trump’s victory speech after Tuesday’s Iowa Caucus.”

    ‘Social media users demanded apologies from Rachel Maddow and MSNBC over the liberal host’s insistence in March that the COVID-19 vaccine stops the virus dead in its tracks and prevents further transmission. “Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person,” Maddow said on her show the evening of March 29, 2021.’

    “Rachel Maddow- ” In her expose of ACORN, Maddow resorted to a fabrication of facts. Ironically, she used an edited video in attempts to prove O’Keefe had edited his video. Problem is, Maddow called it an “unedited” version of O’Keefe’s work – not exactly truthful when her video was 12 minutes, and the original nearly an hour long

    • Let me borrow your equipment so I can say F Madcow. She has been proven wrong on everything out of HER mouth.

  • Maddow must be related to Biden they both are stupid and constantly lying assholes. She doesn’t know what she or it is trying to fit in. Just another dumb black big mouth asshole that’s clueless in a real society. If she didn’t have that job she would be screaming bloody murder racist pig. Do these people have mirrors at home disgusting appearance