Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

The FireAid benefit concert aimed to raise funds for Los Angeles wildfire victims, but pop star Pink decided to shift the focus. After her performance, she introduced John Mayer with a shout-out to “ladies and gentlemen and every other gender that ABSOLUTELY exists.” This statement sparked a mixed reaction, highlighting the divide over identity politics in such settings.

Pink’s comment, loaded with progressive undertones, drew applause from some and criticism from others. Some praised her for making a bold statement, while others felt it was inappropriate at a charity event. The concert’s purpose was to aid wildfire victims, not to further political agendas, which left many questioning her timing.

The charity concert, meant to support those affected by wildfires, was interrupted by Pink’s reference to “every other gender that absolutely exists.” Some attendees felt this was unnecessary, considering the event’s focus on disaster relief. Pink’s comment seemed to divert attention from the concert’s primary goal.

Online reactions to Pink’s comment varied, with some applauding her inclusivity and others criticizing the timing. Social media platforms became a battleground for opinions on her choice of words. For many, the event was about helping those in need, not discussing gender identity.

Pink, known for her outspoken activism, used the concert platform to voice her views. Her statement, however, seemed out of place at an event dedicated to wildfire victims. The focus on identity politics overshadowed the evening’s charitable intentions.

While artists like Green Day, Stevie Nicks, and Lady Gaga concentrated on the victims and relief efforts, Pink chose a different path. Her comment highlighted a recurring trend of political statements at charity events. Many felt this was not the time or place for such discussions.

Pink’s choice to address gender identity at the concert drew attention away from its main cause. Critics argued that the victims of the wildfires deserved the spotlight, not a debate on identity politics. The event’s purpose was muddied by her controversial remarks.

In the entertainment industry, Pink is no stranger to using her platform for activism. However, her remark at the FireAid concert left some questioning her priorities. Many attendees hoped for a focus on relief efforts, rather than political discourse.

The FireAid concert was intended to support families who lost everything in the wildfires. Yet, Pink’s comment about gender identities shifted the narrative. Attendees and viewers were reminded of the pervasive nature of political statements in entertainment.

For those watching the concert, Pink’s statement was a reminder of the ongoing influence of activism in Hollywood. Some appreciated her message, while others felt it detracted from the event’s charitable goals. The mixed reactions underscored the divide in public opinion.

Pink’s performance at the concert brought attention to her progressive stance. However, many felt her comment was misplaced at a disaster relief event. The focus on gender identities seemed irrelevant to the concert’s mission.

The concert aimed to provide relief for wildfire victims, yet Pink’s statement shifted attention. Her comment brought identity politics to the forefront, overshadowing the event’s charitable intentions. The evening’s focus was blurred by her controversial words.

Pink’s statement at the concert sparked debate over the appropriateness of political comments at charity events. Some agreed with her message, while others felt it was unnecessary. The event’s purpose was to support victims, not discuss gender politics.

The FireAid concert was meant to aid those affected by the wildfires, but Pink’s comment diverted attention. Her focus on identity politics overshadowed the evening’s charitable goals. Many felt the victims deserved the spotlight, not political discourse.

In Hollywood, Pink is known for her activism, but her comment at the concert raised eyebrows. The statement seemed out of place, considering the event’s focus on disaster relief. Many attendees hoped for a focus on the victims, rather than political statements.

The FireAid concert aimed to support wildfire victims, yet Pink’s comment shifted the narrative. Her statement brought attention to identity politics, overshadowing the event’s main cause. The focus on relief efforts was blurred by her controversial words.

For many watching the concert, Pink’s statement highlighted the ongoing influence of activism in entertainment. Some agreed with her message, while others felt it was misplaced. The mixed reactions underscored the divide in public opinion.

Pink’s performance at the concert brought her progressive stance to the forefront. However, many felt her comment was out of place at a disaster relief event. The focus on gender identities seemed irrelevant to the concert’s mission.

The concert was intended to provide relief for wildfire victims, yet Pink’s statement shifted attention. Her comment brought identity politics into the spotlight, overshadowing the event’s charitable goals. Many attendees hoped for a focus on the victims, not political discourse.

21 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Pink you stink!!! Supposed to be about fire victims not idiotic gender crap! But that is probably why i could not name one of your songs!!!!!!

  • She likes to speak her mind; well then I’ll say it as I see it and her!

    She is a piece of evil demon shit!

    • Look at the photo and it’s like those two minions are worshiping a goddess; and that in itself points to where they are headed with all their WOKE JOKE Evil Lies!

      Pagan Idolatry!

  • Maybe she should identify what they are. I’m guessing she never took a biology course, or at least never passed one.

    I counted 19 paragraphs in this article. The last 14 were nothing but a re-hash of the first five, just turned upside down, or sideways, is this really necessary?

    • RobL, no and I see this same thing a lot, so someone needs to take more journalism writing classes or hire better people!

    • Dr.BBA, I think her money and fame way over-baked her pea brain and she jumped at this chance like the phony Bishopess took to the event as a platform to advance their radical trans’ anything goes agenda! These people are all sickos and if not psychos definitely evil!

    • Roland; correct like I say they are all bonkers and out to lunch if not in orbit, but here we are in a society where the worst of a society are enabled and coddled to do and act as they please, no matter who or what it destroys! For example in Californication where children’s bodies are now mutilated and puberty blockers are pumped into them with or without parental consent! Unbridled evil!

      America was once a land of morals and values that promoted the best of ideals and goodness in a society; no more!

  • I’m so sick of the kweerz and their supporters dragging their perversion into EVERYTHING.

    What does “…….and every other gender that ABSOLUTELY exists.” have to do with raising funds for the California wild fires?

    Just like that Episcopalian faggot Rev. Mariann Budde ruined the inaugural prayer service.

    Keep your faggotry to yourselves and stop throwing it in everyone’s faces every chance you get. And, you GBLTQ perverts wonder why people hate you???

  • Quinn; I was saying and agree but they are very low bottom feeding scums that are now increased to a plague level where once upon a time they were just a tiny fringe of fools in their own corner! Now they get to piss and shit on everyone and get away with it!