The RedState Weekly Briefing rounds up the week’s most-read stories: missing January 6 footage and pipe-bomb questions, the DOJ stepping in on school discipline tied to gender discussions, X’s clash with the EU over fines, a Minnesota fraud controversy with money-tracking claims, and reporting on Iran’s cascading crises. This briefing walks through each item with a sharp, no-nonsense perspective that favors accountability and common-sense institutions. Expect direct takes, the key quotes intact, and a focus on the facts that matter to citizens concerned about safety, free speech, and good governance.
The top story centers on the missing January 6 camera footage that investigators say would be crucial to understanding the placement of pipe bombs outside political conventions. Lawmakers and investigators are frustrated that 39,000 video frames from vital camera angles appear to be absent, leaving big gaps in the timeline and hampering accountability. That lack of footage raises legitimate questions about how explosives could have been missed and why digital records in key locations are unavailable. Conservatives demand transparency and a full accounting so Americans can trust the investigative process.
As to that last point, Loudermilk went on to explain that there are Capitol Police cameras that picked up footage of the “walking paths” the alleged wannabe bomber took that day. But no, in the areas that would seem critical, those clips are missing. Which is crucial because bomb-sniffing dogs and witnesses somehow missed the devices that day.
“None of the camera angles, like behind the RNC, behind the DNC, that we know of that exists today of where this person would have been, had the closest angles,” he continued. “And so that has inhibited our investigation into this theory of maybe they were placed back out again.”
39,000 video frames, and these, in the most vital locations from January 6th, are missing.
Loudermilk does offer vaguely plausible theories as to why the bombs might have been missed—the dog’s handler might have been distracted when he hit on one device, a witness may not have seen the other device originally—but the fact that the videos apparently don’t exist is quite a hindrance to finding out any information.
Another high-traffic item reports the Department of Justice stepping in after boys were disciplined for speaking about biological realities in school. The piece frames the action as a corrective to schools that have drifted into ideological overreach rather than teaching. The argument is straightforward: schools should protect children and respect basic facts, not punish students for stating biological truth. From a conservative viewpoint, legal and administrative pushback is appropriate when institutions overstep their authority.
The Trump administration has taken a harder stance nationwide, cracking down on schools pushing gender ideology and restoring clear boundaries that protect kids. These are not radical steps. These are yesterday’s norms, revived because today’s institutions have drifted so far into fantasy that they need a legal slap back to reality. Here’s the frustrating part. We shouldn’t need lawsuits to establish that boys shouldn’t be punished for acknowledging biological truth. We shouldn’t need executive orders to keep schools from forcing ideology onto children. We shouldn’t need governors to intervene just to tell grown adults that locker rooms exist for a reason.
We shouldn’t need any of this.
But until common sense becomes common again, this is where we are. Celebrating the victories, while mourning the fact that they were even necessary.
Tech and transatlantic tensions grabbed attention when X responded to a European Union fine in a way that many readers found satisfying. The back-and-forth highlights concerns about EU attempts to regulate American platforms and the broader implications for speech and content moderation. Officials criticized the fine as an overreach into free expression and an attempt to impose foreign rules on American services. Conservatives see this as another front in the fight to defend American tech and users from overseas regulatory pressure.
The reason I warned you not to click on the video is that it isn’t a video. It’s deceptive and clicks through to their website to an article. So the purpose is to fool you into increasing clicks to their site. The DSA they mention is the Digital Services Act.
As we reported, the Trump administration has slammed the fine and the effort to go after “American tech platforms and the American people.” The days of censorship against Americans are over, Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned the EU.
A Minnesota fraud scandal drew scrutiny after claims surfaced about money transfers, including donations allegedly reaching public officials and foreign destinations. Investigators say they are tracing wire transfers outside the regulated banking system and following funds that may have been routed overseas. The coverage emphasizes the need to track illicit flows and hold actors accountable when charitable or governmental funds are misused. Conservative commentators argue for rigorous investigation and sanctions where wrongdoing is proven.
“A lot of money has been transferred the- from the individuals who committed this fraud, including those who donated to the government, Governor, donated to Representative Omar, and donated to AG Ellison,” he said.
Bessent said they were tracking money sent by wire transfer organizations that are outside the regulated banking system and that went overseas.
He explained they had just started looking at the reports about money going to foreign terrorists. Bessent said that Omar had downplayed the fraud scandal and was gaslighting the American people about how it had been handled.
International reporting on Iran highlights widespread shortages, protests, and economic collapse that critics say illustrate the regime’s misplaced priorities. The piece catalogues water, fuel, and electricity shortages while noting the government’s continued investment in military and surveillance capabilities. The quoted passage lays out a stark assessment of how the ruling elite allegedly weaponizes crises rather than serving citizens. Conservatives sympathetic to democratic movements abroad view these developments as evidence that the regime’s grip is weakening.
And the water crisis is only one among many. Fuel and electricity shortages have sparked protests. The economy is collapsing. Unemployment is soaring. Public services are failing. The environment is deteriorating at an alarming pace. A wildfire razed portions of the ancient Hyrcanian Forests, a UNESCO World Heritage site home to many endangered species, in November. Meanwhile, half the adult population lacks meaningful work, yet the regime pours billions into the IRGC, missile programs, regional militias, and vast surveillance networks designed to suppress domestic dissent.
This convergence of crises lays bare a truth that the overwhelming majority of Iranians have long understood: the ruling elite sees government not as a vehicle for public service, but as an apparatus for oppressive domination. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and his loyalists view power as something to be hoarded, not exercised for the public good. Their instinct is not to solve crises but to weaponize them.
The Weekly Briefing keeps the focus on stories that matter to voters: security gaps that need answers, schools that should teach not indoctrinate, tech firms defending free speech, fraud investigations that seek the truth, and foreign crises that expose failed regimes. Readers want clear reporting and accountability, and that’s what this roundup aims to provide with direct, no-frills coverage. Stay engaged, demand transparency, and expect the press to keep asking the tough questions.
Add comment