Byron Donalds publicly blasted both parties for blocking the SAVE America Act, calling the Senate dysfunctional and urging open debate on voter ID — arguing Americans overwhelmingly back proof-of-citizenship rules and that Senate inaction is a failure of governance.
Florida Rep. Byron Donalds unloaded on reporters this week, saying bluntly, “the Senate sucks,” and holding both Democrats and Republicans responsible for stalling action on the SAVE America Act. He framed the bill as a straightforward, popular reform that requires voters to prove citizenship before casting a ballot. Donalds emphasized that this is not a partisan demand limited to one side; he repeatedly flagged broad public support as the reason Congress should act.
Donalds pointed to polling showing strong backing for voter ID and citizenship verification, insisting lawmakers are ignoring what 80 percent of Americans want. He argued the Senate is uniquely to blame for failing to schedule debate or even permit serious floor discussion. In his telling, the chamber’s procedures and culture allow obstruction and inaction to flourish at the expense of voters.
“Man, the Senate sucks. I’m just going to come out and say it: They suck,” he said, calling out the institution by name. He made the case that Americans expect Congress to do hard things when the public is united on policy, and that refusal to act looks like indifference to voters’ priorities. For Donalds, the issue is less about theatrics and more about accountability and transparency.
He pressed the point that Democrats oppose voter ID because it would reduce their electoral advantage, while criticizing Republicans for avoiding open debate that could expose those Democratic arguments to voters. “What is happening in the U.S. Senate is laziness, and quite frankly, it’s disgusting,” he declared, accusing opponents of choosing convenience over confronting the public. Donalds wants the full chamber to air arguments so voters can see where each senator stands.
“What, the Senate Democrats don’t want to have voter ID in America? Why? Because they want to maintain their power,” he said, directly challenging their motives. He also mocked the reluctance among some Senate Republicans to force an actual debate, suggesting they prioritize private meetings over public scrutiny. For him, that avoidance undermines the very idea of representative government.
Donalds urged a filibustering debate if necessary, saying a long, overt effort on the floor would expose weak positions and let the public judge. “If Bernie Sanders wants to hold the floor of the U.S. Senate for six months, let him go ahead. Swap out the Depends, get some body armor, somebody slip you some whatever you need, keep it going,” he said, arguing spectacle would reveal the hollowness of the opposition. He framed that transparency as the remedy for a chamber he calls stagnant and cowardly.
He demanded that leaders like Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth Warren defend their choices in open debate, wanting them to explain to voters why photo ID should not be required. “I want to hear what Chuck Schumer has to say on the floor in full debate about why he opposes this measure. I want to hear what Elizabeth Warren has to say about why she would oppose this measure,” Donalds asserted. He repeatedly pushed the idea that letting opponents speak is the way to convince the public.
https://x.com/AndrewKolvet/status/2070154201938665946
Donalds also linked the SAVE America Act to broader election integrity concerns and criticized those he sees as resisting common-sense safeguards. He framed the bill as President Trump’s top priority and one that should matter to anyone who wants clear, secure elections. The congressman warned that failing to act will leave voters wondering whether elected officials actually represent their interests.
He accused Democratic lawmakers of radicalism and obstruction, saying they refuse negotiation or debate and instead block reforms outright. “The Democrats are true radicals,” he said, insisting they prefer obstruction to compromise. That sharp language underscores the anger among Republicans who view the Senate’s stalling as an existential problem for conservative goals this cycle.
Donalds concluded by lamenting the Senate’s routine inaction and lack of transparency, painting a picture of senators more interested in comfort than accountability. “We send it over to the Senate, and what do they do? They go to lunch. They don’t work. They don’t debate. They go to lunch,” he said, arguing that backroom deals and opaque processes leave voters out. He made clear he and others are fed up and want the issues aired publicly so Americans can judge their leaders.
Add comment