Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced a pied-à-terre tax and then published a searchable list of supposedly taxable non-primary residences, naming owners and addresses; the rollout has drawn sharp Republican criticism for mocking residents, doxxing private homes, and producing a bloated database that appears rife with errors and overreach.
The administration’s initial announcement had a mocking tone, even telling residents “you’ve got mail.” Republicans view that as tone-deaf at best and corrosive at worst, especially when the policy reaches into private addresses. The substance of the policy — taxing second homes in the city — raises real questions about property rights, privacy, and the reach of city government.
Soon after the announcement the city released a searchable database said to list all unoccupied, non-primary residences in the five boroughs valued over $1 million. The list included names and street addresses, a move that instantly alarmed critics who said it effectively flagged homes as potential targets. For many on the right, publishing identifying details of property owners feels like government-enabled doxxing, not careful tax policy.
High-profile names reportedly appeared on the list, including famed director Woody Allen, fashion editor Anna Wintour, and actress Cynthia Nixon, who has publicly backed Mamdani. That juxtaposition of supporters and targets underscored the clumsy execution: people who back the mayor’s agenda can still find themselves exposed by it. It also spotlights the personal risk when government publishes private residence data without adequate verification.
Independent counts found the database swelled to hundreds of thousands of entries, far exceeding the 31,000 properties the policy was initially said to affect. The Post’s tally cited over 960,000 residences and individuals listed as potentially in line to be hit with Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax, even though just 31,000 homes were supposed to be subjected to the new levy as he and Hochul initially sold it to the public. That mismatch suggests the city’s data filters and eligibility checks were either rushed or incompetent.
Local examples raised eyebrows: dozens of modest houses on Chaffee Avenue in Throggs Neck and parts of Staten Island appeared on the list, despite average home values in those neighborhoods ranging from the mid-$500,000s to the low $800,000s. Many of those properties are likely primary residences for working-class families, not luxury second homes. One listed location was even a shopping mall, an obvious sign the dataset was not carefully vetted.
City Council Minority Leader David Carr called out the mayor after discovering his own condo on the list, saying “It’s a reckless and foolish move, especially considering there are potentially thousands of properties on this list that do not qualify as second homes or whose owners will successfully dispute their inclusion.” Republican officials see that as a predictable outcome when policy is rushed and when officials prioritize theatrical moves over precision.
Democrat Councilwoman Gale Brewer also found herself listed despite having lived in her Upper West Side home as a primary residence since 1994, and she said “So, this whole list must be messed up.” Complaints from both sides of the aisle underscore how sloppy data handling can alienate constituents and undercut the credibility of a policy designed to target a narrow, wealthy slice of the market.
Journalist Alex Berenson reported that his 81-year-old mother received a notice even though she’s lived in the same house for 30 years and the purchase price was under $1 million. The notice demands action within three weeks or face a $56,000 bill, and Berenson summed up the frustration with, “Thanks, Zohran Kwame,” a line that captures how personal and punitive this looks to ordinary residents. That kind of threat from city government feeds the Republican critique: heavy-handed taxation enforced by public shaming and shoddy data.
The combination of a taunting launch tone, a public list with names and addresses, and glaring data errors has left conservative observers warning about consequences for safety and privacy. Publishing addresses of potentially unoccupied properties opens doors for criminal activity and harassment, and it makes ordinary homeowners nervous. Republicans argue that sensible tax policy should protect privacy, ensure accuracy, and not treat residents like targets for political theater.
At minimum the rollout should be paused while officials audit the dataset, remove inaccurate entries, and craft procedures that respect primary residences and basic privacy. Lawmakers and residents will rightly demand clear paths for appeals and corrections, and Republicans will press for stronger safeguards against misuse of personal information. Until those fixes happen, the list and the way it was released will stand as a cautionary example of how not to implement a citywide tax policy.
https://x.com/AlexBerenson/status/2081814516124311686
Add comment