Rep. Claudia Tenney, a Republican from New York, has introduced a bill aimed at preventing states from banning certain firearms, specifically rifles and shotguns, that are federally legal. This bill is known as the Second Amendment Guarantee Act, or SAGA for short.
Essentially, SAGA would act as a national law that overrides any state laws trying to ban these types of firearms, as long as they are not banned by the federal government. The bill would also repeal existing bans, like those in New York’s SAFE Act.
Tenney was quoted saying that the SAGA Act would nullify New York’s SAFE Act, which she considers unconstitutional, and would stop other states from passing similar laws that she believes violate the Second Amendment. She emphasized that the bill is about protecting the rights of law-abiding citizens, even in states with what she describes as anti-gun policies.
The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, or CCRKBA, has shown its support for the SAGA Act. They informed Breitbart News about the bill and mentioned that it is being cosponsored by two other representatives: Doug LaMalfa from California and Nick Langworthy from New York.
Alan Gottlieb, the chairman of CCRKBA, expressed that the SAGA Act gives gun owners in America a way to tell lawmakers who are against guns that they are tired of being treated unfairly. He argues that the rights of gun owners are more important than efforts to disarm them or diminish the Second Amendment. Gottlieb also pointed out that millions of people already own these firearms legally and should not be penalized for crimes they haven’t committed, simply for exercising a constitutional right.
AWR Hawkins, an award-winning columnist for Breitbart News, has written about the Second Amendment and related topics. Hawkins also curates a newsletter called Down Range with AWR Hawkins, which covers various Second Amendment issues. He is involved with Armed American Radio, Gun Owners of America, and is part of the marketing team for Lone Star Hunts.
Hawkins has an academic background in military history and has been a Visiting Fellow at the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal. He is active on Instagram under the handle @awr_hawkins and encourages people to sign up for his newsletter through Breitbart’s website. He can be reached via email at [email protected].
The introduction of the SAGA Act has stirred conversations about gun rights and state versus federal law. It raises questions about how much control states should have over gun regulation when compared to federal guidelines. Some see the bill as a necessary protection of constitutional rights, while others view it as an overreach that could undermine efforts to control gun violence.
Proponents of the bill argue that it protects the rights of individuals who responsibly own firearms. They believe that such legislation is crucial in maintaining the balance of power between citizens and the government. Supporters often cite the Second Amendment as a fundamental part of American freedom and democracy.
Critics, however, worry that the bill could lead to increased access to firearms in states that have stricter gun control laws for safety reasons. They argue that local governments should have the power to enact laws that reflect the values and safety needs of their communities without being overridden by federal mandates.
The debate over the SAGA Act highlights the ongoing tension in the United States regarding gun laws and the balance between national and state powers. It brings to light the different perspectives on how best to protect citizens’ rights while also ensuring public safety.
As the bill moves forward, it will likely continue to spark discussions among lawmakers, advocacy groups, and the public. The outcome could have significant implications for gun legislation across the country, potentially reshaping the landscape of gun rights and regulations.
The conversation about SAGA is part of a broader national dialogue on gun rights, reflecting deep-seated beliefs and diverse opinions. Whether the bill will pass and how it will impact existing laws remains to be seen, but it is clear that it has already made waves in the ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and gun control in America.
That’s the Communist run Blue States.
What part of “shall not be infringed” do they not understand?