In a striking political upheaval, Alameda County voters decisively recalled District Attorney Pamela Price, marking the first time an elected DA in the county has been removed from office. Price, known for her progressive policies and backed by billionaire George Soros, faced a swift and overwhelming backlash from voters in one of California’s most liberal regions, including the city of Oakland.
Early results, released Wednesday, showed that 64.8% of voters supported Price’s recall, while only 35.2% voted to retain her. Although the official count is still pending, the margin leaves little doubt about the outcome, reflecting widespread dissatisfaction with her tenure.
Price’s ousting signals a significant shift in public sentiment toward progressive criminal justice reforms, even in traditionally left-leaning areas. Her platform, which emphasized reducing incarceration and promoting alternatives to prosecution, was met with growing criticism as Oakland and surrounding areas saw a surge in crime. Residents and business owners expressed frustration, claiming her policies failed to address escalating violence, theft, and public safety concerns.
The recall comes on the heels of similar voter actions across California. Last year, San Francisco voters recalled DA Chesa Boudin, another Soros-backed prosecutor, amid rising crime rates and public safety complaints. On Tuesday, Los Angeles County DA George Gascón, who championed comparable reforms, lost his re-election bid by a significant margin.
Pamela Price was part of a wave of reform-minded prosecutors whose campaigns received financial backing from Soros. His funding aimed to reshape the U.S. justice system, supporting candidates aligned with the Black Lives Matter movement and committed to reducing mass incarceration. However, the growing backlash against these policies highlights the tension between reformist ideals and public safety demands.
Critics of Soros-backed DAs argue that their leniency contributes to rising crime, undermining community trust and safety. The recall of Price and other prosecutors suggests that voters in even the most progressive enclaves are re-evaluating the impact of such policies.
Price’s tenure was marred by controversies that likely fueled public dissatisfaction. In one high-profile incident, her laptop was stolen from her car in Oakland, a city grappling with a crime wave and reduced law enforcement resources following “defund the police” initiatives. Critics pointed to the irony of the DA herself falling victim to the very crime surge her policies were accused of exacerbating.
Additionally, Price faced allegations of nepotism after hiring her boyfriend for a key position despite concerns about his qualifications and background. These controversies, combined with Oakland’s rising crime rates, galvanized public support for the recall effort.
The recall of Price is part of a larger trend in California, where voters are pushing back against progressive criminal justice reforms. In recent years, crime concerns have prompted legislative changes, including the passage of Proposition 36. This measure aims to counter the effects of Proposition 47, a 2014 law that reduced penalties for certain theft and drug offenses but has been widely criticized for contributing to retail theft and looting.
Proposition 36 reintroduces stricter measures, reflecting a statewide shift toward prioritizing public safety. The success of the recall in Alameda County may inspire similar efforts in other regions, as communities reassess the balance between criminal justice reform and maintaining public safety.
Alameda County’s decision to recall Price could mark a turning point for the progressive criminal justice movement in California and the U.S. at large. While advocates argue that reforms are necessary to address systemic inequities, the growing pushback indicates that voters are unwilling to compromise on safety.
Political analysts suggest that this trend could lead to a resurgence of more traditional, tough-on-crime policies, even in historically liberal areas. As public concern over crime continues to rise, prosecutors may face increased scrutiny, and the appetite for sweeping reforms could wane.
The recall of Pamela Price underscores a broader political shift, as communities demand accountability and effective solutions to public safety challenges. Whether this signals the end of the progressive prosecutor era or simply a recalibration remains to be seen, but the message from Alameda County voters is clear: policies must deliver results.
How about incarcerating her and Soros for Conspiracy and Treason.
And it’s time to tell that traitor Ditch Mitch in the Senate to lose himself unless he would like to join them!
Now, arrest & prosecute the traitor.