Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

Special Counsel John Durham is still pursuing the Clintons and anyone else complicit in the years-long Russian collusion farce against President Trump.

It’s incomprehensible that people continue to ignore that it was a hoax despite the fact that it has been established beyond a reasonable doubt. But this simply goes to demonstrate that leftists are uninterested in learning the truth about a topic before voicing their view. They don’t give a damn about their feelings or what other liberals have told them as long as it benefits their own personal philosophy.

Former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who is accused of lying to the FBI when he claimed he wasn’t representing anyone while handing over information about then-candidate Donald Trump in 2016, also made false statements to CIA officers in a meeting after Trump was sworn in, according to new filings by special counsel John Durham’s team.

According to a text message recently released by prosecutors, Sussmann warned James Baker, the FBI’s chief counsel at the time, that he had “time-sensitive (and sensitive)” material to discuss before the two met. Sussmann claimed in the same message that he was “going on my own—not on behalf of a client or organization,” despite the fact that prosecutors say he was authorized to deliver the information by Rodney Joffe, a technology executive, and billed the Clinton campaign for the service.

This isn’t the only development that has come of the investigation as of lately. It was also reported that the evidence that was used in the Russia collusion hoax was determined by the CIA to have been ‘user created’.

According to the NY Post,

Special Counsel John Durham asserted in a court filing Friday that the CIA concluded data from Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann alleging coordination between Donald Trump and Russia was “not technically plausible” and was “user created.”

In the filing, Durham responded to objections from Sussmann’s defense regarding what evidence could be admissible at Sussmann’s trial, which is scheduled to begin next month. Sussmann is accused of lying to the FBI by saying he was not attending a meeting on behalf of a particular client when he was actually presenting the information on behalf of the Hillary Clinton campaign and a technology executive with whom he worked.

Durham in February first revealed that the government would establish during trial that among the data “exploited” was domain name system (DNS) internet traffic pertaining to “a particular healthcare provider, Trump Tower, Donald Trump’s Central Park West apartment building, and the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP).”

Will they actually finally nail Hillary Clinton? I highly doubt it, but let’s continue to hope so.

Sources:
The Epoch Times

Daniel

Daniel is a conservative syndicated opinion writer and amateur theologian. He writes about topics of politics, culture, freedom, and faith.

View all posts

55 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.