DOJ Requested DNI for More Russia Hoax Documents After Bondi’s Grand Jury Order

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has taken a decisive step by requesting a substantial cache of documents from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) concerning the Russia collusion saga. This move follows US Attorney General Pam Bondi’s directive to a federal prosecutor to present evidence to a grand jury, after a criminal referral from DNI Tulsi Gabbard. It remains to be seen if the grand jury has been fully assembled.

The Federalist reports that the DOJ’s request for documents is part of an ongoing federal investigation into the Obama administration’s actions during the Russiagate operation. The investigation centers on allegations that the administration attempted to frame then-President-elect Donald Trump as a Russian agent who manipulated the 2016 election. This request follows the declassification and release of records from 2016 and 2017.

These records revealed that high-ranking intelligence and law enforcement officials, such as former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan, were involved in crafting a narrative about Russian interference. The declassified materials show that some top intelligence experts had objected to this narrative, citing numerous issues with the intelligence used to support these claims. They even cautioned Brennan against misrepresenting facts and disregarding counter-evidence.

Tulsi Gabbard corroborated The Federalist’s report while speaking to Fox News’ Laura Ingraham. She explained, “Per the president’s order and very specifically, they were tasked to create an intelligence assessment that detailed how Moscow tried to influence the election.” Gabbard emphasized that the assessment was knowingly based on false information.

Gabbard further highlighted that the intelligence assessment relied on discredited documents, such as the politically motivated Steele dossier. This dossier was known to contain falsehoods, yet it was used to build the so-called Russia hoax, aiming to undermine Trump’s presidency. “This was how they came up with the Russia hoax that was then weaponized and used to try to delegitimize President Trump,” she said.

The narrative constructed by Brennan and others was reportedly used to attack Trump, hinder his transition, and even attempt to derail his presidency. Gabbard’s statements have sparked significant attention and debate, particularly among conservative commentators. The implications of these revelations are substantial, as they bring into question the integrity of the intelligence assessments used during Trump’s presidency.

Fox News and other outlets have been closely following this development, providing additional context and analysis. These revelations have reignited discussions about the actions of former Obama administration officials. The DOJ’s pursuit of these documents underscores the seriousness with which these allegations are being treated.

The release of these records has fueled calls for accountability and transparency regarding the origins and perpetuation of the Russia collusion narrative. Conservative voices argue that the time has come for those responsible to be held to account for their actions. The investigation continues to unfold, with many eager to see how it will impact the political landscape.

As more information comes to light, the focus remains on uncovering the truth behind the Russiagate operation. The DOJ’s actions suggest a strong commitment to examining these past events thoroughly. The outcome of this investigation may have far-reaching consequences for those involved.