Minnesota has been boiling over with confrontations tied to anti-ICE activism, and the latest episodes show ordinary people being harassed, a disturbing restaurant incident involving tech workers, and questions about a city email that may have coordinated information sharing about ICE activity.
Things escalated recently in Minneapolis, with reports of an ICE agent attacked, federal vehicles vandalized, and weapons taken from government vehicles. Those events set a tense backdrop for smaller, but revealing, incidents where civilians were caught in the crossfire of activism and suspicion.
Warning for graphic language in the following tweets:
Federal officials have said the targeting expanded beyond federal assets to private citizens and civilian vehicles. Border Patrol leadership described assaults on non-government cars, underscoring how disorder has spread into public spaces where everyday people should feel safe.
One of the most striking episodes involved five software engineers having lunch at a neighborhood deli, who suddenly found themselves accused of being ICE agents. The group were white men in casual clothing, and a rapid response alert circulated on anti-ICE channels identifying them as purported immigration enforcement personnel.
“My friend was shocked,” Lee said. “He’s on the [anti-ICE] side politically. He lives nearby. He’s eaten there before. And suddenly he’s seeing messages saying we’re ICE.”
Lee said the alert was shared among regional anti-ICE networks, drawing dozens of protesters to the restaurant within 15 minutes.
When protesters arrived, the engineers reported being berated, whistled at, and pushed into a defensive posture while trying to explain who they were. One man offered context: “We do custom apps for a whole bunch of companies around Minnesota and the country.” Their words did little to stop the confrontation, illustrating how quickly suspicion can become mob behavior.
The crowd appears unconvinced, prompting one of the men to ask, “Do I look like an ICE agent?” to which a woman responds, “Yeah, you look like a f-cking ICE agent.”
Someone else yells, “get the f-ck out” as whistles blow.
“This is what’s wrong with your guys’ cause,” the man says.
A woman asks, “Would you support [us]?”
The man answers, “The way you guys are acting? No. And I don’t support ICE either,” adding, “I’m just trying to enjoy my lunch!”
“If you’re not with us then you’re against us,” the woman responds.
That exchange captures how political policing of private life has become. Activists weren’t asking for information to protect anyone; they were demanding ideological conformity from strangers and turning a meal into a public shaming. This kind of behavior smells like the very intolerance activists claim to oppose.
After the incident, the engineers reportedly left more skeptical of the movement than before, with one saying, “One of us is pro-ICE, one anti-ICE, others on the fence,” and that the encounter left people rethinking their assumptions. If the goal was to win hearts and minds, this kind of intimidation achieves the opposite.
Beyond the personal confrontations, there’s a bigger institutional question hovering over these events: a city email allegedly indicating Minneapolis was tracking and sharing reports about ICE activity with community groups. If city officials were coordinating or facilitating activist notifications, that blurs the line between government and vigilante action and raises legal and ethical concerns.
Republicans should highlight how permissive leadership and lax oversight create fertile ground for escalation. When city offices appear to be involved in distributing information that can fuel street-level actions, voters deserve clear answers about accountability and the boundaries between civic engagement and enabling harassment.
Even apart from official complicity, this is a cultural failure. When political zeal justifies mob tactics and profiling, everyday people get dragged into dangerous confrontations simply for how they look or where they sit. That fosters fear, chills public life, and makes communities less safe for everyone.
Law enforcement and local officials have to draw a line. Public safety is not a partisan talking point—it is the baseline requirement for normal civic functioning. Allowing or appearing to enable harassment undercuts trust in institutions across the board and invites further chaos.
The incidents in Minnesota are a warning shot: unchecked activism that crosses into intimidation, plus any city coordination of information, can spiral into civil disorder and civil rights violations. Elected leaders need to answer whether they are protecting residents or empowering mobs, and Americans deserve straightforward, accountable responses from those in charge.
Add comment