Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley recently unveiled FBI whistleblower records that shed light on an anti-Trump agent’s involvement in former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s 2020 case against President Donald Trump. During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing for President Trump’s FBI director nominee, Kash Patel, Grassley introduced the whistleblower’s existence. Internal FBI emails shared with Grassley by a DOJ whistleblower, and obtained by Fox News, reveal the anti-Trump agent’s pivotal role in launching and advancing the investigation.

The emails suggest that this agent bypassed standard protocols, linking Trump to the investigation without clear justification. Known internally as “Arctic Frost,” the probe into President Trump commenced on April 13, 2022. Documents shared with Fox News by Senators Grassley and Ron Johnson indicate that the investigation’s roots trace back to FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge Timothy Thibault.

Thibault, who was dismissed from the bureau for violating the Hatch Act, allegedly demonstrated partisanship that influenced investigations involving Trump and Hunter Biden. Fox News reported a February 14, 2022, email in which Thibault corresponded with a subordinate, providing draft language that eventually became central to Smith’s elector case. Thibault communicated with John Crabb, a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office, asserting the rationale for including Trump as a subject.

Despite lacking authorization to initiate criminal investigations, Thibault took steps to involve Trump. An email from the same day reveals Thibault planning to seek approval from Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray. On February 25, 2022, a subordinate agent, Michelle Ball, emailed Thibault about adding Trump and others as subjects, to which he responded, “Perfect.”

By April 11, 2022, Thibault had approved the opening of “Arctic Frost.” Two days later, an FBI agent informed Thibault that the case had been green-lit by the bureau’s deputy director. Thibault then updated Crabb on the approval, receiving a reply, “Thanks a lot. Let’s talk next week.”

Grassley, during Patel’s confirmation hearing, pointed out that between March 22 and April 13, multiple versions of the investigation document existed. An email indicated that the FBI General Counsel’s office made edits on March 25. Grassley questioned whether Trump was still a subject of investigation and which officials added him for prosecution.

The emails imply that Richard Pilger, a DOJ official in the Public Integrity Section, reviewed and signed off on Arctic Frost, enabling the DOJ to pursue a full-scale criminal and grand jury investigation. This investigation later evolved into Smith’s elector case against Trump. Grassley had previously expressed concerns about Pilger’s DOJ record.

In 2021, Grassley released a report highlighting issues with Pilger’s record. The following year, both Grassley and Johnson raised alarms about Smith overseeing an investigation flawed from its inception. They noted Pilger’s involvement in the case’s early stages.

As these revelations unfold, Grassley and Johnson continue their scrutiny of the investigation’s origins. The senators seek clarity on the decisions made by DOJ and FBI officials. The whistleblower records have sparked significant discussion regarding the investigation’s integrity.

Critics argue that the investigation may have been tainted by bias from its inception. The involvement of an anti-Trump agent raises questions about the motives behind the case. Supporters of Trump view these findings as vindication.

The case has drawn widespread attention, with many questioning the fairness of the proceedings. Grassley’s efforts to expose potential misconduct have been met with both praise and criticism. The political implications of the investigation continue to reverberate.

As the investigation’s details emerge, conservative voices call for accountability. They emphasize the need for transparency and justice. The revelations highlight ongoing tensions between political ideologies.

Grassley’s revelations have sparked a broader conversation about the role of bias in federal investigations. The involvement of partisan figures in high-stakes cases remains a contentious issue. The outcome of this debate could influence future investigations.

The whistleblower’s information has added fuel to the fire of partisan debates. It underscores the importance of maintaining neutrality in law enforcement. As the situation develops, stakeholders on both sides remain vigilant.

The case serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in political investigations. The balance between justice and partisanship is delicate and crucial. Observers continue to watch the unfolding events with keen interest.

5 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Why has nobody indicated Smith for impersonating a federal prosecutor which he was never. That’s federal criminal corruption. That should put him in prison for 20 years. And then Trump should sue him personally and NYC and the DOJ and every government agency and officials. This is the biggest government corruption F-ckup ever and it cost Millions and Millions of taxpayers money on all fraud charges because asshole democrats were scared of Trump becoming president and exposing how corrupt the real are. People better start going to prison for a long time. Corrupt Prosecutors and judges department heads need to be investigated and indicted immediately. All these corrupt criminals should be in prison and have the sh-t sued out of them. Biden’s Harris and democrats administration were the most incompetent corrupt government administration ever to be in charge of this country. History is going to destroy each and everyone of them for ever.