In a recent ruling, U.S. District Judge Richard E. Myers, appointed by former President Donald Trump, denied a significant portion of a lawsuit filed by the Republican National Committee (RNC) and North Carolina Republican Party.
This lawsuit sought to enforce stricter identification measures on 225,000 voter registrations in North Carolina, alleging that the state failed to meet federal guidelines under the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) when verifying new voter applications. The RNC argued that these lapses by the North Carolina State Board of Elections (NCSBE) could compromise the integrity of the voter rolls, potentially allowing ineligible voters, including non-citizens, to participate in the electoral process.
The RNC’s case centers on alleged failures by the NCSBE to collect essential identification information—such as driver’s license numbers or Social Security digits—from a substantial number of voters who registered in recent years. The lawsuit claimed that without this information, verifying voter eligibility is more challenging, which could lead to voter fraud and weaken public confidence in the electoral system.
In its filing, the RNC stated that “The North Carolina State Board of Elections betrayed that trust when it allowed over 225,000 people to register to vote with registration forms that failed to collect certain required identification information before the registration forms were processed, a plain violation of Section 303 of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA).” The RNC argued that this alleged failure to enforce HAVA’s standards compromises the accuracy of the voter rolls, which are required by law to be maintained and purged of ineligible voters.
The RNC’s suit was grounded on a specific violation of HAVA, a federal law enacted in 2002 to standardize election procedures across states, in part by creating clear voter eligibility verification standards. According to the RNC, the NCSBE’s shortcomings could lead to illegal voting and diluted votes for legitimate voters. The plaintiffs urged the NCSBE to enforce identification requirements retroactively, which would require the board to revalidate the eligibility of these 225,000 registrations to maintain what the RNC claims would be an accurate and lawful voter roll.
While NCSBE admitted that its previous registration forms fell short of HAVA standards, it took action by updating the forms to address this deficiency. However, the board declined to implement retroactive checks on previously registered voters, a measure that the RNC insisted upon. In response, the NCSBE asserted that voters who may have registered without the required ID would be filtered out naturally as they engaged in future election-related activities, such as verifying their identities in subsequent elections.
However, Judge Myers dismissed the main component of the RNC’s lawsuit, citing that the Help America Vote Act does not grant private entities or individuals a “private right of action” to enforce compliance. This legal concept restricts the enforcement of HAVA to state or federal authorities, preventing organizations like the RNC from suing state boards over perceived HAVA violations. The judge’s ruling underlined that only state and federal agencies have the jurisdiction to ensure HAVA compliance, leaving the RNC without a legal avenue to directly force the NCSBE to alter its procedures based on HAVA violations.
Although Judge Myers dismissed this crucial part of the RNC’s case, he did not dismiss the entire lawsuit. The remaining claims in the lawsuit pertain to state-level laws rather than federal statutes, specifically the North Carolina General Statute § 163-82.11(c). This statute mandates that the NCSBE identify and address any discrepancies in the voter rolls, though the extent of these obligations remains subject to interpretation by North Carolina courts.
Judge Myers’ decision remands the case back to the state court, where North Carolina’s legal system will now determine whether the NCSBE’s handling of voter registration forms violated state law. This means any further decision on whether to enforce stricter identification checks or remove these registrations from voter rolls will rest with North Carolina’s judiciary rather than federal courts.
The RNC and North Carolina Republican Party argue that NCSBE’s refusal to impose retroactive checks undermines the reliability of the voter rolls, particularly as the state heads into another election cycle. The plaintiffs contend that accurate voter information is essential for a fair election process, asserting that allowing ineligible individuals on the voter rolls is both a legal and ethical failure. Proponents of the RNC’s position argue that strict voter verification is essential to protect the electoral process from fraud and build public confidence in election integrity.
Opponents, however, caution that aggressive voter roll purges and retroactive requirements may disproportionately impact legitimate voters, potentially disenfranchising marginalized groups. Civil rights advocates have voiced concerns that such measures could prevent eligible voters from participating in elections, particularly if those individuals lack access to required identification or face obstacles in obtaining it. They argue that voter disenfranchisement poses a greater threat to election integrity than alleged fraudulent registrations.
Judge Myers’ ruling places North Carolina courts in a position to address these unresolved state-level claims, setting a potential precedent for how voter roll maintenance laws will be interpreted in the state moving forward. Should North Carolina’s courts favor the RNC’s request for tighter voter registration scrutiny, it could prompt a ripple effect across other states where similar concerns about HAVA compliance have been raised. On the other hand, a ruling in favor of the NCSBE could reinforce the discretion state election boards have in managing their voter rolls.
As the legal proceedings shift to state court, the outcome remains uncertain, and the implications could affect how election boards across the country approach voter roll maintenance and HAVA compliance.
Another backstabber Communist to get Communist Kamala the win by creating the biggest cheating in a federal election.
They’re just giving the finger to all of American born voters and saying the true Americans are all the Illegals who’ll vote the way Communist Democrats want them to vote.!
So far it doesn’t look like we’re going to take our Country back since the Republicans don’t have the guts to take out the Communist in Washington DC and across the Nation IE, Judges, AG’S, Attorneys, Governors, Mayor’s.
The question is How many Americans are ready to transition from Freedom to Communism.?
No more Christianity, No more Christmas, no more Easter Sundays, no more Freedom of assembly, no more Freedom of speech, No more voting rights, No more 2nd Amendment to protect yourself.!
We’ll be told what/when/How on many issues you’ll be allowed to do.
A Communist Sodom and Gamorah utopia will emerge and our children will be taken away from all of us.
Pedophilia and Homosexuality will rise up.!
Civil War is the only answer should Communist Kamala gain power and the Communist homosexual Muslim Barack Hussein Obama gets his 4th term.
we are slaves to the STATE (since 1865) because we don’t obey the founders and Jesus. Both said to separate from evil , or an evil gov’t. The republic that Lincoln destroyed needs to be restored, or we will die as the cowards we are.
You’re so right, we need a big group of people to take care of this sorry a=s gay Obama and his gay man-woman wife Michael that are using this sorry a=s gay braindead Biden and the sorry a=s street wh=re B. Harris as his puppet and all the sorry a=s Muslims in our USA office.
Kamala Harris loves repeating one phrase—over and over—as if she’s discovered the secret to life itself: “Imagine what can be, unburdened by what has been.” At first glance, it’s easy to dismiss this as another example of Kamala’s garbled “word salad” speeches. But there’s something more sinister beneath the surface—this isn’t just a random collection of words meant to sound profound. No, this is a calculated dog whistle, cloaked in progressive ideals, designed to signal her true, radical intentions.
Let’s start by dissecting the phrase itself. “Imagine what can be…” sounds hopeful at first, right? It’s a call to envision a bright, limitless future. But then comes the kicker: “…unburdened by what has been.” Here’s where the danger lies—Kamala isn’t talking about removing past mistakes to move forward; she’s talking about erasing history.
It’s straight out of the playbook of Marxist revolutionaries. Think about it: every attempt at reshaping society into a so-called “utopia” has required the eradication of history, traditions, and culture—all in the name of starting over. From the brutal purges under Mao in China to Pol Pot’s violent “Year Zero” campaign in Cambodia, the goal has always been the same: wipe out the past to control the future. Kamala’s phrase is a dog whistle to those who see America’s foundational values as obstacles to be destroyed, not preserved. This is how radical change is justified—by presenting history itself as a burden rather than a foundation.
Why Kamala’s Rhetoric Matters: It’s More Than Just Stupidity
Kamala’s repeated use of this phrase is infuriating for a reason: it’s not just empty rhetoric—it’s intentional propaganda. And that’s why we can’t afford to simply write her off as dumb or ill-prepared. Kamala Harris’s words might seem ridiculous on the surface, but their underlying message is cunning. This is an attempt to galvanize her base, especially the radical left that sees America’s history as inherently evil.
Kamala’s dog whistle isn’t meant for the average American—it’s designed for those who are deeply committed to a radical transformation of America’s core. To them, her phrase is a call to erase everything that came before—to rip out the roots of American exceptionalism in the name of “equity” and “social justice.” This isn’t progress; it’s a revolutionary agenda hiding in plain sight.
The Reality Behind the ‘Unburdened’ Phrase: A Call for Cultural Erasure
When Kamala talks about imagining what can be “unburdened by what has been,” she’s not promoting progress—she’s promoting cultural erasure. The unburdening she speaks of isn’t just about eliminating oppression; it’s about dismantling everything that defines America as it currently stands
Free speech? That’s a burden.
Second Amendment rights? Another burden.
Traditional family values? Yet another burden.
To Kamala and her ilk, these foundational principles aren’t virtues to be cherished—they’re shackles to be broken. But make no mistake: this vision of “progress” doesn’t lead to a utopia. It leads to chaos and authoritarian control, as history has repeatedly shown.
Why Kamala’s Phrase Should Worry Every American
Kamala Harris isn’t just stumbling through speeches, bumbling her way from one gaffe to the next. This phrase is carefully crafted, and its repetition is strategic. She’s dog-whistling to a very specific audience—those who believe in fundamentally transforming America by obliterating its past. It’s the same tactic we’ve seen throughout history, from Marxists to modern leftists: disguise your true intentions behind vague but “inspirational” language. The mainstream media may call it “visionary,” but conservatives should call it what it really is: a warning sign.
Kamala’s vision of “unburdening” isn’t just empty talk. It’s a coded message to radicalize the left and push America further down the path of socialist-style upheaval. It’s a veiled threat against the very foundations of our republic—against the Constitution, against freedom, and against everything that has made America great.
It’s easy to laugh off Kamala Harris as uninformed or out of her depth. But her repeated use of this phrase should be seen for what it is: a call to erase America’s heritage in the name of a new, radical order. It’s not merely incompetence—it’s a calculated move to pave the way for a revolution that tears down what the left views as “burdensome” history.
We must not underestimate her rhetoric or the impact it could have on those who are already radicalized. It’s time to wake up to the truth behind Kamala’s favorite phrase and what it really signals for the future of America.
My God, you’ve got to be really stupid to cheer and vote for that destructive Communist Bitch.!
Communist voters will blame President Trump when all our history and freedoms are eliminated, that’s the way their brain is wired and they should be shot like a rapid dog.!
Vote for President Trump America it’s our last chance to save ourselves.
you left out the other divider of Amerika, Marxist (Michael) Luther King. someone else with a bad birth certificate. she/it was born in Canada. NOT natural born citizen…. socialist HATE laws and independent folks. They love the low IQ (like themselves)
These judges are bought and paid for by the communist democrat party. The states need to ignore the federal judges. There is something dirty about this whole thing. Their dirty.
The communist party with the help of these communist judges have bankrupted this country. They need to be held accountable and the supreme court needs to step in and give the conservatives in this country some help.
This election if it’s allowed isn’t about economics or prices it is about the fact that communist have taken control of our government under a queer Obama..they ignore the main law of our country that is why you have a government to protect the border and protect the American people..this is wide open treason..maybe if a really huge amount of people vote we can overcome the “fix” it will certainly be harder to hide..but speaking to my fellow Americans..do not give up your guns..claim they have been stolen..and hide them well..cause if they get back in control..you will need them and plenty of ammunition ..our future is on the line these are very nasty communist thugs..you see it every day..congress , Supreme Court, the constitution..are all ignored..because under a communist democracy..you have a supreme leader..not a constitution
Track down anyone voting illegally and prosecute to the full extent of the law. Scare the next bunch into obscurity.
Don’t even start the cheating. It is not going to work.
when did the feds take over the “states” voting rolls? 1965, right after the REAL insurrection, Nov. 22 1963 that no one talks about. RED states need to separate from this evil empire called Amerika
Yes they do Timothy, my State Texas should have done this on day one when Soros, Obama and Biden stole the election.
If the Communist Democrats manage to pull off the biggest election steal, you can bet I’m not giving up my firearms without a fight.
And they’ll never shut me up even if Communist Kamala destroys the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
You got this right, there is no sorry a=s b=st=rd will shut me up and NO BRAINDEAD demonRAT man enough to take my gun and if he wants to try he better bring his own body bag.
They proved this sorry a=s scumbag cheated by getting dead people votes and the voting machines kicking Trump votes out and I still would like to know how this b=st=rd still got to sit in Mr. Trumps big man chair?
As a proud supporter of President Trump and a firm believer in his ability to restore common sense to our government, I know most of you share the same sentiment. After all, his presidency marked a significant shift toward policies that prioritized America first, from strengthening our borders to renegotiating unfair trade deals and standing firm against foreign adversaries. But as the 2024 election nears, we can’t ignore the looming reality of the legal battles he faces, which have been fueled by what many of us believe to be the weaponization of the judicial system by Democrats.
While I’m confident that Trump has a strong chance of winning, we need to understand the legal implications he could face if the unexpected happens, and he loses the election. So I did some research into this scenario. Let’s dive into the current status of his legal cases, what’s at stake for him personally, and how this all fits into the broader picture of his fight against what he deems to be a rigged system.
The phrase “weaponization of the judicial system” is not just rhetoric—it’s a reality that Trump has been vocal about since the beginning of his legal battles. Trump has argued that the Democrats are using legal institutions to undermine his political career and derail his bid for the White House. His supporters view these legal cases as politically motivated attacks designed to hinder his momentum and, ultimately, the movement he represents. But let’s break down what these cases are and how they could play out, particularly if Trump doesn’t win in 2024.
The Four Major Cases Trump Faces
Trump is currently navigating through four major legal battles, each carrying its own set of risks and complexities.
1. Federal Election Interference Case
In one of the most significant cases, Trump faces federal charges related to alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results. Special Counsel Jack Smith has accused Trump of plotting to undermine the election’s outcome, a charge that many conservatives view as an exaggerated interpretation of Trump’s fight against voter fraud. If Trump were to lose the election, this case could potentially lead to a lengthy trial and severe legal consequences, including imprisonment.
2. Classified Documents Case
This case involves allegations that Trump unlawfully retained classified documents at Mar-a-Lago after leaving the White House. The prosecution claims that Trump mishandled sensitive information, though Trump argues that he had the right to possess these documents under the Presidential Records Act. A conviction here could lead to serious penalties, but Trump’s legal team has been fighting aggressively, appealing the case’s handling and jurisdiction. If Trump isn’t re-elected, the case could proceed rapidly, putting him at risk of a harsh sentence.
3. Georgia Election Interference Case
Trump also faces state-level charges in Georgia, where Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has indicted him for allegedly tampering with the 2020 election results in Georgia. Many legal experts believe that this case, unlike federal cases, could be more challenging to dismiss due to federal-state legal boundaries. If Trump doesn’t win in 2024, this case could advance more quickly, potentially resulting in serious consequences.
4. Manhattan Business Records Case
The most immediate threat is the Manhattan case, where Trump has already been convicted of falsifying business records to cover up a scandal. Sentencing is set for three weeks after the 2024 election. If he loses, Trump could face jail time as Justice Juan Merchan decides his fate. Trump’s team plans to argue that as a 78-year-old man with no prior convictions, he should avoid imprisonment. However, over a third of defendants in similar cases have served jail time, making this a critical moment in Trump’s legal journey.
If Trump is defeated at the polls, the legal scenarios change dramatically. His ability to influence or potentially dismiss federal cases would be gone, as he would no longer have control over the Department of Justice. This would leave him vulnerable to sentencing and further prosecutions. Here’s how each case could unfold:
In the federal cases: Without presidential immunity, Trump could face full trials that may result in convictions and possible prison sentences.
In the Georgia case: As a state-level case, it is less likely to be hindered by any potential federal intervention, meaning that it could move forward more quickly.
In the Manhattan case: Sentencing could result in jail time, especially since Trump has already been found guilty.
The courts have shown that they are willing to move aggressively, and without the protection of the presidency, Trump would be on his own to fight these battles.
Despite the legal challenges, Trump has turned these cases into a rallying cry for his supporters. He portrays himself as a victim of a corrupt system, claiming that these cases are not just attacks on him but on the American people who believe in his vision. The weaponization of the judicial system has become a key talking point in his campaign, resonating with those who feel that the establishment will do anything to prevent him from regaining power.
However, if Trump were to lose the election, the media and political establishment could seize the opportunity to shift the narrative, presenting a loss as validation of the legal attacks against him. This would be a significant blow not just to Trump but to the movement he represents.
While we remain optimistic about Trump’s chances of winning, it’s important to understand the legal realities he could face if he loses. The judicial system’s role in these cases raises serious questions about fairness and the integrity of our institutions. Whether or not you agree with Trump’s legal strategy, it’s clear that he’s fighting more than just a political battle—he’s fighting for his freedom. As Trump himself has said, winning the White House would mean these cases “simply go away,” highlighting the personal stakes in this election.
So, as we head into Election Day, let’s keep our eyes wide open, knowing what’s at stake not just for Trump but for the principles of justice and accountability in our nation.
If We The People are to save our freedoms and Republic, it’s imperative we get out and vote for President Trump, he’s stuck his neck out for each and everyone of us..
Therefore we must get out and vote President Trump.
The Communist Democrats and Rinos have prepared to steal the election, If this happens we’ll get exactly what the Communist wants.!
Look at what the Communist have done already to America, and if Communist Kamala gets in, it’ll be 10 x’s worse.
Remember, President Trump had every legal right to possess his Records under the Presidential Records Act.
Joe Biden stole classified records when he was a Senator and VP, they were found strewn all over his garage and in his corvette, did he get charged for Sedition and impeached.?
No.! Did the gutless Republicans involved the 25th ammendment.? No.!
Every President before him was allowed to take Records home, so why was President Trump being charged.?
Because the Justice system is weaponized in the Communist favor.! Taxpayers money is being used in payoffs.!
I know, not a word said to this gay braindead Biden, but the sorry a=s FBI planted crap in Trumps home and all this other crap with him in court, Biden, the sorry a=s b=t=ch Clinton and the security guards were in on trying to kill Trump. they got the scumbag Muslims in our office and the AOC ex-bar-tender b=t=ch and this street wh=re slut Harris which is the only way that she got where she is, is by being on her knees doing her job on all the guys, the sorry a=s worthless tramp.
This judge should be removed for allowing non-citizens to be able to vote, he is as illogical as the illegal immigrants. The people allowing these people to register in the first place should be arrested.
I’ve just read where Communist Kamala is considering Dumbass Communist AOC for Speaker of the House.
My God, the Communist are alot more stupid than I could have imagined.
AOC lacks the intelligence of seaweed.! By placing an idiot fool as Speaker it’ll be easy for Communist homosexual Muslim Barack Hussein Obama to get her to pass any amount of money they want to steal from the American taxpayers.!