Dr. Francis Collins, a long-standing figure in the National Institutes of Health (NIH), has stepped down from his role, leaving behind a mixed legacy. After more than three decades at the agency, his retirement follows allegations of dishonesty regarding gain-of-function research. Collins, who has been a central figure in various health discussions, expressed gratitude for his tenure at NIH.
A few years ago, in 2021, Collins found himself at the center of controversy after documents revealed discrepancies in his statements about research in Wuhan. Despite these revelations, he maintained a fondness for the NIH, calling his leadership a privilege. In his statement, Collins emphasized his belief in leadership renewal, suggesting it was time for a new scientist to guide the agency forward.
Under Collins’ leadership, the NIH faced numerous challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic. He was vocal about public health measures, even suggesting parents wear masks at home around unvaccinated children—advice that many found perplexing. His stance was criticized as overly cautious, especially given the minimal risk COVID-19 posed to children.
The controversy surrounding Collins didn’t end there; he admitted on a radio show that the U.S. had collaborated with the Wuhan lab. This admission fueled further debate about the NIH’s role in the pandemic’s origins. Critics, including Rutgers professor Richard Ebright, accused Collins and Anthony Fauci of misleading the public about the nature of their research.
As Collins exits, President Trump has nominated Dr. Jay Bhattacharya as his successor. Known for his criticism of COVID-19 lockdowns, Bhattacharya’s nomination signals a shift in NIH’s direction. Trump praised Bhattacharya’s commitment to transparency and innovation in medical research.
Dr. Bhattacharya, a Stanford professor, gained recognition during the pandemic for opposing governmental overreach. His work, including co-authoring The Great Barrington Declaration, underscored his data-driven approach to public health policy. Bhattacharya’s nomination has been well-received by those advocating for reform in scientific institutions.
In his acceptance of the nomination, Bhattacharya expressed a desire to restore trust in American scientific bodies. He emphasized the importance of deploying scientific advancements to improve public health. His collaboration with figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suggests a potential for significant change at the NIH.
Bhattacharya’s legal involvement in the Murthy v. Missouri case further highlights his dedication to challenging government policies. The case, which reached the Supreme Court, was pivotal in discussing individual rights during the pandemic. His role in such high-profile cases underscores his influence in health policy debates.
With Collins’ departure, the NIH stands at a crossroads, poised for potential reform under new leadership. The transition marks a significant moment for the agency as it navigates post-pandemic challenges. Observers are keen to see how Bhattacharya’s leadership will shape the NIH’s future.
The changes at NIH reflect broader discussions about trust and accountability in science. As the agency moves forward, the emphasis on transparency and innovation will be crucial. The coming years will likely define the NIH’s role in addressing public health issues.
The focus on scientific integrity is particularly pertinent given past controversies. The NIH’s ability to adapt and innovate remains vital in its mission to advance health research. Bhattacharya’s leadership will be instrumental in steering the agency through these evolving challenges.
As the NIH transitions, the scientific community and the public will be watching closely. The agency’s direction under Bhattacharya could set new precedents in health research and policy. The focus will be on ensuring science serves the public good with renewed trust and accountability.
The agency’s future initiatives will likely be scrutinized for their impact on public health. Bhattacharya’s approach may redefine how the NIH engages with scientific and policy issues. His leadership could influence broader discussions about the role of science in society.
The nomination of Bhattacharya has sparked discussions about the NIH’s priorities. His track record suggests a focus on evidence-based policy and scientific freedom. The implications of his leadership will be closely observed by both supporters and critics.
As the NIH embarks on this new chapter, the emphasis on reform and trust remains paramount. Bhattacharya’s goals align with a vision of science that prioritizes public welfare. His tenure could redefine the NIH’s contributions to global health advancements.
please NEVER say “covid pandemic”. proper phrasing is covid SCAM.
Absolutely and mass murder!
Put these people in prison for life sentences and strip them of all their assets period.
Another greedy, Leftist, dirt bag bites the dust.
All those Covid scam-demic, deceivers should be lined up against a brick wall and shot.
These are all evil souls that sold out! I just left this long commentary elsewhere on this site pertaining to the crux of this matter! I hope it helps some poor people who must wake up to God’s truth fast!
I did my homework as soon as the whole fiasco began and I knew from facts that I readily found available from some top very reputable and trustworthy experts along with my own insights and intuition that is was a hoax! Bill Gates that devil along with Klaus Schwab were very preemptive to the crisis months before pushing a Globalist Agenda that all tied together as a giant conspiracy to control the human race and seize absolute totalitarian control! None of what the so called experts at the NIH, CDC and the WHO were peddling added up at all! Now they have ZERO credibility and that won’t be restored for years if ever again!
I’ll trust in the Lord!
They are genetic altering not curative concoctions and I studied what some of the best honest experts had said at the start how sadly everyone that took the jabs would have a window of time where their own demise would be initiated and accelerated due to this poison! I pray for you all because we need God more than ever now; these devils have done damage beyond imagination to humanity!
In Jesus’ name I pray have mercy on all those who were victimized!
This is the case! Back in 2021 I wrote extensively after researching this and sifted through as much data as I could, in order to see clearly how “this was all a master diabolical plan to eliminate human beings!” Here is a small sample of what I wrote and I did quote extensively back then much of what the Nuremberg Code Laws specified under Crimes Against Humanity said to these types of criminal acts of coercion and forced medical treatments upon humanity! I knew they were guilty then and I sure know it now even more! This they can do to barnyard animals but not human beings! Evil bitches and bastards did this and must face Criminal Judgment!
This is an absolute transgression and violation of the Nuremberg Code and a crime against humanity these Nazi/Fascist/Commies that did this all belong in prison cells awaiting a Military Tribunal trial and then summary executions! This isn’t Communist China or WWII Nazi Germany!!!
“Cassandra Renner, who used to work as a Medical Technician at the senior living center, provided details about one incident that should give everyone pause.
A resident refused the vaccine, as is their right. From there, they were given a sedative, which was compared to Xanax. In order to make sure that she got the shot, they lied to her and told her that it was something else.”
“You might have thought that this was the worst of the story. By the next morning, the patient had passed away.”
They have executed this poor old woman, “She’s no longer with us and in her last moments of life she had to have her dignity removed,” according to this whistleblower Renner!
Dignity removed is not the term she was MURDERED!
Brother in Christ Jesus,
Lawrence