Law Firm Advises Schools to Destroy Student Immigration Records to Block Trump’s Deportation Efforts: Report

A law firm based in New England has reportedly given advice to public schools on handling student immigration records amid President Donald Trump’s push for stricter deportation measures. This guidance came to light through an email obtained by the Maine Wire, dated January 21. The email from Drummond Woodsum offered school officials “legal guidance” on navigating the administration’s immigration policies, particularly those concerning enforcement activities in educational settings.

Drummond Woodsum, established in 1965 and operating in Maine, New Hampshire, and Arizona, warned schools through its “Immigration Client Alert” about potential changes to a 2011 policy memorandum. This directive had previously instructed federal agents to avoid enforcement activities at “sensitive locations,” such as schools. The firm expressed concern that the Trump administration might “repeal and/or disregard” this policy, signaling a shift that could involve school resource officers in immigration enforcement efforts.

School officials were encouraged to prepare for possible interactions with immigration authorities. The alert suggested creating a plan and providing training for staff members who might encounter such officials. This proactive stance was framed as a necessary step in safeguarding student privacy and rights within the educational environment.

A critical aspect of Drummond Woodsum’s advice focused on the handling of student information. The firm urged schools to be cautious about the type of data they maintain, especially if immigration officials were to request access.

The email highlighted a straightforward approach: minimizing the retention of sensitive information. Schools were advised against inquiring about the citizenship or immigration status of students and their families unless absolutely necessary.

While acknowledging that some data collection might be required for specific programs, like language instruction for English learners, the firm emphasized that such information should not be included in a student’s permanent education record. Once the information was no longer needed, it should be disposed of promptly to avoid potential misuse or exposure.

The email clarified that while school officials cannot directly obstruct immigration officers, they also have no obligation to assist in the apprehension of individuals identified in ICE administrative warrants. This distinction provides a clear boundary for schools navigating federal immigration laws while protecting their students’ interests.

The Trump administration’s Department of Justice has made it clear that it will not tolerate any attempts by local officials to impede ICE agents. A memo from Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove outlined the federal stance, stating that law prohibits state and local actors from resisting or obstructing lawful immigration commands and requests.

The DOJ has committed to investigating and potentially prosecuting instances of misconduct that interfere with federal functions. This position underscores the administration’s intent to enforce immigration laws vigorously and ensure local compliance.

Despite requests for comment from Blaze News, Drummond Woodsum did not provide a response. This silence leaves room for further speculation about the firm’s role and the broader implications of its advice to schools.

The debate over immigration enforcement in educational settings continues to be a contentious issue. Trump’s administration has prioritized strict enforcement, creating tensions between federal authorities and local entities. The guidance from Drummond Woodsum reflects the challenges schools face in balancing compliance with federal laws and the protection of their students’ rights.

By advising schools on how to manage sensitive information, the firm has highlighted the importance of privacy and the need for clear policies in uncertain times. As the administration’s immigration strategies evolve, schools must remain vigilant and prepared to adapt to new directives.

The ongoing dialogue around immigration enforcement and education underscores the complexity of policy implementation at the local level. Schools serve as critical environments for learning and development, and their role in these broader political discussions cannot be overlooked.

As the situation develops, it will be essential for schools to stay informed and seek legal counsel to navigate these challenges effectively. The balance between federal mandates and local autonomy remains a delicate one, with significant implications for the communities involved.

Ultimately, the guidance from Drummond Woodsum serves as a reminder of the legal and ethical responsibilities schools bear in protecting their students while adhering to federal laws.