Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

A bill has been introduced in California by Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel (D) that would outlaw the use of certain additives in processed foods and candies. These substances, which include brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, propyl paraben, red dye 3, and titanium dioxide, are found in popular products such as Skittles, Sour Patch Kids, jellybeans, Trident sugar-free gum, Pez, Hostess desserts, Campbell’s soup, Old El Paso queso sauce, and certain brands of bread.

According to Gabriel’s statement on the matter this bill is intended to “correct for a concerning lack of federal oversight and help protect our kids, public health and the safety of our food supply.” The European Union has already banned the use of these additives due to potential public health risks such as increased cancer risk, behavioral issues for children and reproductive harm. It is also noted that these products are often marketed towards children with low-income families or communities of color being particularly vulnerable.

However, the National Confectioners Association along with other groups such as the California Grocers Association and American Chemistry Council have issued statements that cite their belief that this bill is premature given the fact that they believe these chemicals are safe. These organizations have argued that all five additives have been throughly reviewed by multiple scientific bodies and deemed safe for use in food products. As well they point out the impact this bill could have on jobs as it is estimated that confectionery industry alone adds $7.7 billion to California’s economy while providing over 100 thousand direct and indirect jobs throughout the Golden State area.

My personal take on this is that these additives are not safe. Should they be illegal? Well, I don’t think it’s necessary, I just think that people should make better choices. I don’t buy foods with those ingredients in them, and others can make that same decision if they choose to as well. Eventually, if enough people did that, the companies would change their ingredients to reflect healthier choices. We vote with our wallets. We don’t need Democrats telling us what we can and can’t eat.

Daniel

Daniel is a conservative syndicated opinion writer and amateur theologian. He writes about topics of politics, culture, freedom, and faith.

View all posts

6 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • I’m paid $185 per hour to complete the task using an Apple laptop. I absolutely didn’t think it was conceivable, but my dependable buddy convinced me to give this straightforward chance a go after she made $26,569 in just 4 weeks working on it. Visit the following page to find out additional
    .
    .
    Instructions—————————>>> easywork9.blogspot.com

  • I’ve got my first check total of $15,550, pretty cool. I am so excited, this is the first time i Actually earned something. I am going to work even harder now and I can’t wait for next week’s payment. Go to the home tab for more detail. I highly recommend everyone to apply… Americanliberty3.neocities.org

  • Here we go again it affects colored and low income. The adds I see are for the general public and have yet to see any that points directly at the so called poor or colored. So sick and tired of seeing the same statement over and over as it really gets old. If it is so bad here then move to the country that loves you. Only problem is they don’t have the welfare system and you would have to work to eat.

  • Has California banned WATER one the grounds it is used in the production of “known carcinogens” yet?

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.